Background Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence.Methods ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362.

Purpose of ReviewProvide a current overview regarding the optimal strategy for managing patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.Recent FindingsCarotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) reduce long-term stroke risk in asymptomatic patients. However, CAS is associated with a higher risk of peri-procedural stroke. Improvements in best medical therapy (BMT) have renewed uncertainty regarding the extent to which results from older randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes following carotid intervention can be generalised to modern medical practise.Summary‘Average surgical risk’ patients with an asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis of 60–99% and increased risk of late stroke should be considered for either CEA or CAS. In patients deemed ‘high risk’ for surgery, CAS is indicated. Use of an anti-platelet, anti-hypertensive and statin, with strict glycaemic control, is recommended. Results from ongoing large, multicentre RCTs comparing CEA, CAS and BMT will provide clarity regarding the optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

No abstract

Background: Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting, in addition to good medical therapy, halve long-term stroke risk in asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis. Since the absolute benefits following successful intervention are moderate, identification of asymptomatic patients at high-risk of future stroke could maximise the effectiveness of carotid interventions.Aim: To summarise the evidence for high-risk features associated with increased long-term stroke risk in asymptomatic patients. Results:There is a paucity of reliable data describing the effect of clinical features, imaging findings and plaque characteristics on increased long-term stroke risk. Clinical and imaging features such as contralateral symptoms, silent brain infarcts/embolic signals, progression of stenosis and impaired cerebrovascular reactivity may be associated with increased future risk of stroke. Plaque characteristics such as echolucency, large plaque size (≥80mm), intra-plaque haemorrhage, lipid-rich necrotic core and thinned/ruptured fibrous cap may also increase future risk of stroke. Whilst these form the basis for European guidelines targeting carotid intervention in asymptomatic patients with tight stenosis, conclusive evidence of their utility is lacking. Conclusions:Results from ongoing large, multi-centre randomised clinical trials comparing carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting with good medical therapy may be consistent with earlier trials, showing a halving of the long-term risk of stroke following successful carotid revascularisation. However, they may well lack sufficient statistical power to identify higher-risk subgroups in whom the absolute gains of treatment are significantly higher. Large contemporary cohort studies are needed to provide further clarity regarding high-risk features associated with increased long-term stroke risk in asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis.