Objective: To compare the outcome of endoscopic transtympanic cartilage myringoplasty with and without removal of perforation edges for repairing chronic perforations with mucosal chronic otitis media (COM). Study design:Quasi-randomised clinical trial.Setting: Tertiary referral centre. Materials and Methods:Patients with chronic perforations and mucosal COM undergoing endoscopic transtympanic cartilage myringoplasty were allocated to a control group for whom the perforation edges were preserved (n = 40) and an intervention group for whom the edges were removed (n = 39). Mean operation time, graft success rate, mean scores of graft neovascularisation and epithelialisation, and hearing were compared between the groups at 4 weeks and/or 6 months postoperatively.Results: Graft success rate was 95% (38/40) in the control group and 97% (38/39) in the intervention group at 6 months postoperatively; the difference was not significant. Mean graft neovascularisation scores 4 weeks postoperatively were 2.52 ± 0.59 in the control group and 2.58 ± 0.55 in the intervention group; the difference was not significant. Mean graft epithelisation scores 4 weeks postoperatively were 1.48 ± 0.57 in the control group and 1.68 ± 0.51 in the intervention group; the difference was not significant and remained nonsignificant 6 months postoperatively (2.5 ± 0.55 vs. 2.76 ± 0.36). Audiological outcomes at 6 months did not differ between the groups. Conclusion:Endoscopic, transtympanic cartilage underlay myringoplasty with preservation of the perforation margins did not affect graft neovascularisation, epithelialisation or success. Longer-term outcomes and risk of cholesteatoma require further study.
Background/objective. Most researchers consider that basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) facilitates the repair of chronic tympanic membrane (TM) perforations in chronic otitis media (COM). However, the addition of biological materials affects bFGF levels. This study was performed to compare the effects of bFGF alone and myringoplasty for the repair of chronic perforations. Study design. A prospective cohort control study. Materials and methods. Patients with chronic central perforations who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups, i.e., bFGF alone group and underlay myringoplasty group. In the bFGF alone group, the epithelium was removed circumferentially around the perforation edge to create fresh edges. Approximately, 0.1–0.15 mL of bFGF solution was applied twice daily for 3 months to the TM, to keep the edges moist without a scaffold. In the myringoplasty group, the perichondrium graft was placed underneath the TM remnant by endoscopy. TM closure and hearing outcomes were evaluated at 12 weeks after surgery or at the end of bFGF treatment. Results. A total of 29 patients consisting 13 in the bFGF alone group and 16 in the myringoplasty group were finally included in the analysis. Of the 13 patients in the bFGF alone group, the perforations were small in 6 and medium in 7; the etiology was secondary to COM in 11 and to trauma in 2. One patient with an unhealed perforation continued bFGF treatment until 6 months, while the others stopped at 3 months. Of the seven medium-sized perforations, none of the five COM perforations closed, while the two traumatic perforations achieved complete closure within 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. The successful closure rate was 28.6% (2/7). Successful closure was achieved in 66.7% (4/6) of the six small perforations with COM, with a mean closure time of 4.75 weeks. Of the 16 patients in the myringoplasty group, all perforations were medium-sized and were secondary to COM in 15 cases and traumatic in 1 case; all achieved complete closure. Conclusions. bFGF alone facilitated the repair of chronic traumatic perforations and small perforations with COM, but not medium-sized perforations with COM. These observations indicated that the regenerative conditions of traumatic perforations are better than those of COM perforations when using bFGF alone, and that graft materials could play a critical role in the regeneration of larger-sized chronic perforations with COM.
Objectives The objective of this trial was to compare outcomes of electrocoagulation tuboplasty and continued medical therapy for treating persistent Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) with hypertrophic mucosa disease in the Eustachian tube (ET) orifice. Study Design Prospective, case-control trial. Material and Methods Patients with persistent ETD were recruited and allocated to electrocoagulation tuboplasty and continued medical therapy groups. The ETD questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) score and objective parameters were compared between the groups at 6 and 12 months. Results The proportion of patients with a decrease in ETDQ-7 scores was greater in the electrocoagulation group than in the medical therapy group at the 6-month follow-up (53.49% and 34.38%, respectively; p = .158), but the difference was not statistically significant. However, at the 12-month follow-up, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients with a decrease in ETDQ-7 scores in the electrocoagulation group (88.37% and 40.63%, respectively; p = .001). Additionally, a significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of the proportion of patients who improved 12 months after the treatment (tympanometry: 72.09% and 9.38%, respectively; p = .001; air-bone gap: 79.07% and 25.00%, respectively; p = .001; tympanic membrane status: 62.79% and 0.00%, respectively). In addition, the proportion of patients with improvements in the ET inflammation score was significantly different between the groups at 6-month (67.44% and 34.38%, respectively; p = .009) and 12-month (93.02% and 34.38%; p = .001) follow-ups. No device- or procedure-related serious adverse events were reported in any patients. Conclusions Electrocoagulation Eustachian tuboplasty appears to be a safe and feasible procedure for adult persistent ETD with hypertrophic mucosa disease in the ET orifice, and is superior to continued medical management alone. The improvements in ETDQ-7 and objective parameters persisted for 12 months.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.