One of the merits of recently introduced exoscopes, including ORBEYE, is that they are superior to a conventional microscope in terms of ergonomic features. Taking advantage of it, the retrosigmoid approach can be performed in the supine position using ORBEYE. We report a consecutive series of 14 operations through the retrosigmoid approach in the supine position using ORBEYE. Fourteen consecutive patients who underwent surgery through the retrosigmoid approach for cerebellopontine (CP) angle lesions in the supine position using ORBEYE were targeted, and surgical outcomes and complications were examined. We evaluated the posture of the operator and the surgical field during this approach compared with those using a conventional microscope. In all 14 cases, all operative procedures were accomplished only using the ORBEYE. There were no operative complications due to this approach. Using ORBEYE, even when the angle of the operative visual axis was horizontal, the operators could manipulate in a comfortable posture. They were not forced to be in an uncomfortable posture that extended their arms, as is often the case with a conventional microscope. Therefore, they could use shorter surgical instruments. As the cerebellum shifted downward with gravity even using slight retraction during this approach, the working space of the surgical field was easily secured. Through this approach, the operators can perform stable microsurgery of CP angle lesions in a comfortable posture. This approach can reduce the burden on the operator and the patient, leading to a refined surgical procedure.

No abstract

Introduction Endovascular surgery is minimally invasive, but the radiation exposure can be problematic. There is no report assessing whether radiation exposure can be reduced by using a low pulse rate during carotid artery stenting (CAS). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether reducing the pulse rate from 7.5 to 4 frames per second (f/s) can reduce the radiation exposure while maintaining safety during CAS procedure. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the radiation data and clinical features of all 100 patients who underwent CAS between 2014 and 2019. We changed the pulse rate from 7.5 to 4 f/s in 2017. The fluoroscopic time (FT), dose area product (DAP), and total air kerma (AK) were collected. Statistical analyses were performed between the pulse rate and clinical outcomes, including radiation exposure.

Background: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using conventional surgical microscope has been already established as golden standard. Recently, exoscope was introduced into the field of neurosurgery, and various merits of it have been reported. We report the experiences of exoscopic CEA using a movable 4K 3D monitor and discuss the feasibility of it. Methods: We report a consecutive series of 15 cases of exoscopic CEA for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis using a movable 4K 3D monitor between January 2020 and April 2021. We utilized ORBEYE as an exoscope system and a 31-inch movable 4K 3D monitor, which was installed in the Maquet Moduevo ceiling supply unit. Results: In all 15 cases, the procedures were accomplished only using the ORBEYE. There were no operative complications due to the use of the exoscope. In response to the operative site, the 4K 3D monitor was moved to face the operator. Even when the angle of the visual axis of the exoscope against the horizontal plane was small during the surgical manipulation in the distal portion of ICA, the operator was able to maintain a comfortable posture. Conclusion: Using the movable 4K 3D monitor, exoscopic CEA can be performed ergonomically. The operator can manipulate the distal portion of the ICA or proximal portion of the common carotid artery in a comfortable posture and face the monitor by adjusting its position.

We have developed a new educational approach to microsurgery in which a trainee and supervisor can cooperate with “4 hands” using the exoscope. We evaluated 4-hands surgery for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) using the exoscope to validate the educational value and ergonomic advantages of this method. Thirty consecutive patients who underwent surgery for ICH using the exoscope between December 2018 and May 2020 were studied retrospectively. All operations were performed by a team comprising a supervisor (assistant) and a trainee (main operator). The assistant set the visual axis of the exoscope, and adjusted focus and magnification as a scopist. After setting the ORBEYE, the supervisor helped retract the brain and withdraw and irrigate the hematoma using suction tubes or brain retractors. Moreover, the trainee evacuated the hematoma with a suction tube and coagulated using bipolar forceps. Patient background and results of treatment were evaluated. Intraoperative postures of the operators were observed, and schemas compared with the use of a conventional microscope were developed. All microsurgical procedures were accomplished by a trainee with a supervisor using only the exoscope. During the surgery, the surgeons could work in a comfortable posture, and the supervisor and trainee could cooperate in microsurgical procedures using their four hands. The results of the present case series concerning evacuation of ICH were not inferior to those described in previous reports. To increase opportunities for education in microsurgery, 4-hands surgery for ICH using the exoscope appears feasible and safe and offered excellent educational value and ergonomic advantages.