Drug discovery is an important process in which biomedical experts identify new potential treatments for diseases. Currently, this requires much time and manual effort, so automating any part of the process would be a significant improvement. Thus, we propose to identify drug candidates via explainable automated fact-checking. That is, given a hypothesized drug-disease treatment relationship, we aim to generate explanations for the hypothesis as a means for determining whether or not the drug could be a potential treatment for the disease. Our goal in this paper is to develop such an approach that is well-suited for the biomedical domain.Direct application of existing fact-checking tools faces several challenges since most are not developed for use within the biomedical domain; both the explanation formats and the evaluation metrics are ill-suited for this domain application. We propose explanations in the form of knowledge graph patterns, which directly relate to existing structures used by biomedical experts, as well as evaluation metrics which rely solely on existing evidence present in knowledge graphs and make no domain-specific assumptions. We report experimental results, which suggest that, for the drug discovery task and potentially others, our metrics are accurate, and our explanations are understandable and reasonable to domain experts, as well as useful.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.