Background/Introduction
Obesity and atrial fibrillation (AF) coexist and share multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Lifestyle modifications can reduce AF burden in obese patients. However, the time invested in pursing lifestyle changes may delay AF ablation, which could negate the procedural benefit.
Purpose
To examine the effects of lifestyle modifications and the timing of catheter ablation on morbidly obese patients with AF.
Methods
This retrospective study included 217 consecutive AF patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 undergoing AF ablation at a tertiary care center from 2012 to 2019. Modifiable risks were examined, including the time from AF diagnosis to ablation, fluctuation of BMI >5% or an increase in BMI >3% prior to ablation, mean systolic blood pressure >130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >80 mmHg, obstructive sleep apnea with CPAP noncompliance, hyperlipidemia without statin therapy, tobacco use, excessive alcohol use, and diabetes mellitus with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥6.5%. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent atrial arrhythmias and cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations following AF ablation. A multivariate analysis adjusting for age, gender and modifiable risks was performed.
Results
The mean age was 61±9 years old, 58% were female and 45% had persistent AF. A substantial portion of the study patients had modifiable risk factors, ranging from 2.7% with excessive alcohol use to 67.3% experiencing delayed AF ablation, Figure 1. The median time from diagnosed AF to ablation was 1.3 years. During a mean follow-up of 2.9 years after AF ablation, 136 (62.7%) patients met the primary outcome. Only HbA1c ≥6.5% was an independent risk factor with adjusted hazard ratio of 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.02–2.36, P=0.0412, Figure 2A. Delayed AF ablation did not alter the outcome, Figure 2B. There was no interaction between time of ablation and HbA1c ≥6.5% (P=0.67).
Conclusion
Substantial portions of morbidly obese patients undergoing AF ablation have potentially modifiable risk factors. Poor glycemic control with HbA1c ≥6.5% predicts an increased risk of recurrent atrial arrhythmias and CV hospitalizations, while delayed AF ablation does not. This finding underscores an importance of optimizing HbA1c in morbidly obese patients with AF to reduce adverse outcomes after ablation.
FUNDunding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Introduction. Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a rare connective tissue disorder attributed to a defect in the fibrillin-1 gene. Aortic aneurysms and dissection are common causes of morbidity and mortality in Marfan syndrome. Case Report. A 43-year-old female with a history of MFS and a 4.0 cm dilated ascending aorta presented to her cardiologist reporting that since a C-section two years prior, the left side of her abdomen painlessly protruded when standing. An outpatient CT scan of the abdomen/pelvis noted a 5.5 cm abdominal aortic dissection, and she was directed to the hospital. Repeat CT scan of the abdomen/pelvis revealed a 5.6 cm dissecting aneurysm of the infrarenal abdominal aorta. The patient was admitted to the ICU and started on a nitroglycerin drip to maintain systolic blood pressure less than 110 mmHg. The patient underwent repair of her abdominal aortic dissection via a retroperitoneal approach, and she tolerated the procedure well. She was started on metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg BID and aspirin 81 mg postoperatively. She was safely discharged with follow-up care. Conclusion. This case stresses the importance of having a low threshold to obtain imaging in a MFS patient with protruding abdomen, even though the patient may not have pain and be hemodynamically stable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.