Objectives
Treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism is parathyroidectomy. This study identifies the association between hypoalbuminemia (HA) and outcomes in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism.
Methods
This retrospective cohort analysis utilized the 2006–2015 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Current Procedure Terminology codes were used to identify patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. Prolonged length of stay (LOS) was defined as a duration of 2 days or greater. Demographics and comorbidities were compared between HA (serum albumin <3.5 g/dL) and non‐HA cohorts using chi‐square analysis. The independent effect of HA on adverse outcomes was analyzed using binary logistic regression.
Results
A total of 7183 cases with primary hyperparathyroidism were classified into HA (n = 381) and non‐HA (n = 6802) cohorts. HA patients had increased complications, including renal insufficiency (0.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.001), sepsis (1.0% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.003), pneumonia (0.8% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.018), acute renal failure (1.0% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001), and unplanned intubation (1.3% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.004). HA patients had increased risk of death (1.6% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001), prolonged LOS (40.9% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001), and any complication (5.5% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). Adjusted binary logistic regression indicated HA patients experienced increased odds of progressive renal insufficiency (OR 18.396, 95% CI 1.844–183.571, p = 0.013), prolonged LOS (OR 4.892; 95% CI 3.571–6.703; p < 0.001), unplanned reoperation (OR 2.472; 95% CI 1.012–6.035; p = 0.047), and unplanned readmission (OR 3.541; 95% CI 1.858–6.748; p < 0.001).
Conclusions
HA may be associated with adverse complications in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism.
Level of Evidence
3 Laryngoscope, 133:2035–2039, 2023
Background Although recent studies have identified an association between race and adverse outcomes in head and neck surgeries, there are limited data examining the impact of racial disparities on adult inpatient outcomes following epistaxis management procedures. Objective To analyze the association between race and adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients undergoing epistaxis treatment. Methods This retrospective cohort analysis utilized the 2003 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify cases with a primary diagnosis of epistaxis that underwent a procedure for epistaxis control. Cases with missing data were excluded. Higher total charges and prolonged length of stay (LOS) were indicated by values greater than the 75th percentile. Demographics, hospital characteristics, Elixhauser comorbidity score, and complications were compared among race cohorts using univariate chi-square analysis and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The independent effect of race on adverse outcomes was analyzed using multivariate binary logistic regression while adjusting for the aforementioned variables. Results Of the 83 356 cases of epistaxis included, 80.3% were White, 12.5% Black, and 7.2% Hispanic. Black patients had increased odds of urinary/renal complications (odds ratio [OR] 2.148, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.797-2.569, P < .001) compared to White patients. Additionally, Black patients experienced higher odds of prolonged LOS (OR 1.227, 95% CI 1.101-1.367, P < .001) and higher total charges (OR 1.257, 95% CI 1.109-1.426, P < .001) compared to White patients. Similarly, Hispanic patients were more likely to experience urinary/renal complications (OR 1.605, 95% CI 1.244-2.071, P < .001), higher total charges (OR 1.519, 95% CI 1.302-1.772, P < .001), and prolonged LOS (OR 1.157, 95% CI 1.007-1.331, P = .040) compared to White patients. Conclusion Race is an important factor associated with an increased incidence of complications in hospitalized patients treated for epistaxis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.