Quality control is essential in a multicentre setting to enable CT quantification. CNRs in a body-sized phantom had the recommended value of at least 1.5. CTDIs and DLPs varied by factors of 1.8 and 2.4 respectively.
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune inflammatory demyelinating disease that causes significant disabilities. Latest MS epidemiological data in Australia reveal rising prevalence. No epidemiological study of MS has been conducted so far in the Illawarra region.Aim: To calculate prevalence and incidence of MS in the Illawarra region and compare with data from other regions, states and the national prevalence.Methods: Data of MS patients in the Illawarra region were collected from hospital medical records, ambulatory care units and hospital pharmacy. Prevalence was calculated for alive MS patients on 30 June 2018 expressed per 100 000 population. Yearly adjusted incidence rate was calculated for 10 years (2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)(2019), expressed as cases per 100 000 population-years.Results: Estimated MS prevalence in the Illawarra region was 116.6 per 100 000 population with yearly incidence (2009-2019) of 5.06 cases per 100 000 population-years (female to male, 3:1). Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) was the most common type (277/ 397; 69.7%) with primary progressive MS (PPMS) in 52/397 (13%), and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) in 45/397 (11.3%; unknown in 23). The commonest age at diagnosis ranged between 30 and 39 years for all types with RRMS and PPMS between 30-39 years and 40-49 years respectively. The most common recorded treatment was natalizumab (103 patients), followed by fingolimod (82 patients) and interferon (58 patients).
Conclusion:The calculated MS prevalence in the Illawarra region is higher than New South Wales and the Australian average MS prevalence. Further epidemiological studies focussing on MS risk factors and other factors bearing on MS prevalence in the Illawarra region are required.
IntroductionMinimising delay in thrombolysis is a key outcome in acute stroke care.MethodsA 3 year retrospective cohort analysis of all acute stroke admissions in Wollongong Hospital, a major regional referral centre in New South Wales, was completed to determine the causes of in-hospital delays for thrombolysis. Data collected included age, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, onset time, arrival time, CT imaging & reporting time and outcomes of the event.ResultsFrom 656 admissions, 70 cases of thrombolysis were recorded 56 cases of endovascular thrombectomy. The mean time from onset to arrival was 85 minutes, from arrival to CT was 31 minutes and from door to needle time (DNT) was 108 minutes. Multiple regression analysis revealed a an inverse linear association between onset to arrival time and DNT. Age, stroke severity and gender were not shown to impact treatment times. The results showed that there was a paradoxical association between arrival time and DNT. The cause for this was not clearly identified but similar to previous studies is likely to be contributed by a lack of urgency when initiating management.1 2ConclusionFor every 30-minute delay in hospital arrival, there was a 13- minute reduction in DNT. In light of this, education trials to promote ‘time equals brain’ understanding amongst stroke first responders is being implemented to aim to reduce DNT to less than 80 minutes. The results of this are anticipated to be available in mid 2019.ReferencesAlbers GW, Bates VE, Clark WM. Intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator for treatment of acute stroke: The Standard Treatment with Alteplase to Reverse Stroke (STARS) Study. Journal of the American Medical Association 2000; 283:1145–1150.Romano JG, Muller N, Merino JG, Forteza AM, Koch S, Rabinstein AA. In-hospital delays to stroke thrombolysis: paradoxical effct of early arrival. Neurological Research 2007;29:664–666.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.