BackgroundCirculating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma has shown potential as biomarker in various cancers and could become an importance source for tumour mutation detection. The objectives of our study were to establish a normal range of cfDNA in a cohort of healthy individuals and to compare this with four cohorts of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. We also investigated the prognostic value of cfDNA and analysed the tumour-specific KRAS mutations in the plasma.MethodsThe study was a prospective biomarker evaluation in four consecutive Phase II trials, including 229 patients with chemotherapy refractory mCRC and 100 healthy individuals. Plasma was obtained from an EDTA blood-sample, and the total number of DNA alleles and KRAS mutated alleles were assessed using an in-house ARMS-qPCR as previously described.ResultsMedian cfDNA levels were higher in mCRC compared to controls (p <0.0001). ROC analysis revealed an AUC of 0.9486 (p<0.00001). Data showed impaired OS with increasing levels of baseline cfDNA both when categorising patients by quartiles of cfDNA and into low or high cfDNA groups based on the upper normal range of the control group (Median OS 10.2 (8.3–11.7) and 5.2 (4.6–5.9) months, respectively, HR 1.78, p = 0.0006). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent prognostic value of cfDNA (HR 1.5 (95% CI 1.3–1.7) for each increase in the cfDNA quartile). The overall concordance of KRAS mutations in plasma and tissue was high (85%).ConclusionsThese data confirm the prognostic value of cfDNA measurement in plasma and utility for mutation detection with the method presented.

The purpose was to investigate total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients during treatment with secondline chemotherapy and in healthy controls and patients with different comorbidities. Patient treated with second-line irinotecan for metastatic CRC (n 5 100), a cohort of healthy controls with and without comorbidity (n 5 70 and 100, respectively) were included. cfDNA was quantified by an in-house developed quantitative polymerase chain reaction from plasma samples drawn prior to the first cycle of chemotherapy and at time of progression. cfDNA levels were significantly higher in CRC compared to controls, with a clear capability for discriminating between the groups (receiver operation curve analysis; area under the curve 0.82, p < 0.0001). Patients with high levels had a shorter survival from irinotecan compared to those with lover levels. The cohort independent upper normal limit divided patients into high and low risk groups. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-3.4] and 6.5 (95% CI 4.2-7.2) months [hazard ratio (HR) 2.53; 95% CI 1.57-4.06, p < 0.0001] and overall survival (OS) 7.4 months (95% CI 4.3-8.7) and 13.8 months (95% CI 11.9-18.9; HR 2.52; 95% CI 1.54-4.13, p < 0.0000), respectively. Cox regression multivariate analysis showed a PFS HR of 1.4 (95% CI 1.1-1.7) for each increase in cfDNA quartile, p 5 0.03 and 1.6 (1.3-2.0) for OS, p < 0.0001, respectively. A combined marker analysis with plasma KRAS mutations added further prognostic impact, which was consistent when performed on the samples drawn at time of progression. In conclusion, cfDNA measurement holds important clinical information and could become a useful tool for prediction of outcome from chemotherapy in mCRC.Despite the availability of several effective cytotoxic drugs and new biological agents the prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is still poor and the curative options are limited to a subgroup of patients with resectable metastasis. Consequently, the majority of patients will be offered several lines of palliative chemotherapy, which imply a high level of side effects and careful selection of patients and monitoring during therapy is therefore essential. Irinotecan (a semisynthetic analog of camptothecin) is widely used in combination with flouropyrimidines or as monotherapy for mCRC. 1 The major dose limitating toxicities include diarrhea and myelosupression. 2,3 Better selection criteria in terms of predictive and prognostic markers to optimize treatment are needed.The presence of circulating nucleic acids in peripheral circulation was discovered more than 60 years ago by Mandel and Metais 4 followed by Leon et al. 5 in 1971 who later described the importance of circulating tumor DNA in cancer development. A substantial proportion of the circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cancer patients is believed to originate from tumor cells. 6,7 Recent studies have consequently focused on the multipurpose utility of cfDNA for molecular characterization to aid in...

Background:Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) circulating in the blood holds a possible prognostic value in malignant diseases. Under malignant conditions, the level of cfDNA increases but the biological mechanism remains to be fully understood. We aimed to examine the correlation between cfDNA and total tumour burden defined by positron emission tomography (PET) parameters.Methods:Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled into a prospective biomarker trial. Before treatment, plasma was extracted and the level of cfDNA was determined by qPCR. An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) scan was performed and evaluated in terms of metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Tumour contours were delineated semi-automatically by a threshold standardised uptake value (SUV) of 2.5. The primary end point was correlation among cfDNA, MTV and TLG. The secondary end point was overall survival (OS) according to cfDNA, MTV and TLG.Results:Fifty-three patients were included. There were no correlations between cfDNA and MTV (r=0.1) or TLG (r=0.1). cfDNA >75th percentile was correlated with shorter OS (P=0.02), confirmed in a multivariate analysis. MTV>the median was associated with a significantly shorter OS (P=0.02). There was no significant difference in OS according to TLG (P=0.08).Conclusion:Cell-free DNA may not be a simple measure of tumour burden, but seems to reflect more complex mechanisms of tumour biology, making it attractive as an independent prognostic marker.

No abstract

KRAS and BRAF mutations are responsible for primary resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) MoAbs in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but it is unknown what causes wildtype (wt) patients to develop resistance during treatment. We measured circulating free DNA (cfDNA), KRAS and BRAF in plasma and report the changes during third line treatment with cetuximab and irinotecan. One-hundred-and-eight patients received irinotecan 350 mg/m 2 q3w and weekly cetuximab (250 mg/m 2