Clinicians should screen patients for fatigue and assess for contributing factors at clinic visits. Methods to integrate evidence-based fatigue interventions into practice should be tested and outcomes evaluated.

Programs for gifted and talented education should be guided by research-based practices, but states’ policies vary in their recommendations for programming, and in how they hold local education agencies accountable for implementing those recommendations. State plans for gifted and talented education rely on the voluntary compliance of districts to implement policies meeting students’ advanced academic needs and providing opportunities for talent development. State plans for gifted education may outline expectations, but leave much about the implementation up to districts. Even within a state, gifted education services vary widely across districts and individual schools. This research identified 11 state plans for gifted education that included guidance on identification, curriculum, service options, professional development, and program evaluation. Through thematic analysis, eight primary themes and three secondary themes were identified, which demonstrate the necessity of ongoing program evaluation balancing the need for standardization with the need to adapt policies to fit local contexts.

Scholars and practitioners of gifted education have made strides in recognizing the need for equitable identification practices, as well as acknowledging the importance of culturally relevant teaching practices, so that students from traditionally underrepresented student populations (i.e., culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse [CLED] students, rural students) have the opportunity to develop their unique gifts and talents. However, little attention has been paid to the vital roles that parent/family and community have in shaping a gifted and talented child’s future. The relationship between students’ families, communities, and their school is often an overlooked variable, but one that has the potential to make significant improvements in gifted education for traditionally underrepresented students in gifted education. This article identifies potential barriers to forming strong home–school connections and outlines specific strategies for overcoming these stumbling blocks. We discuss ways in which teachers and administrators can utilize specific engagement strategies, rethink structures within the school environment, and employ responsive attitudes and behaviors to cultivate strong, healthy home–school connections.

No abstract

No abstract