'New' memories are initially labile and sensitive to disruption before being consolidated into stable long-term memories. Much evidence indicates that this consolidation involves the synthesis of new proteins in neurons. The lateral and basal nuclei of the amygdala (LBA) are believed to be a site of memory storage in fear learning. Infusion of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin into the LBA shortly after training prevents consolidation of fear memories. Here we show that consolidated fear memories, when reactivated during retrieval, return to a labile state in which infusion of anisomycin shortly after memory reactivation produces amnesia on later tests, regardless of whether reactivation was performed 1 or 14 days after conditioning. The same treatment with anisomycin, in the absence of memory reactivation, left memory intact. Consistent with a time-limited role for protein synthesis production in consolidation, delay of the infusion until six hours after memory reactivation produced no amnesia. Our data show that consolidated fear memories, when reactivated, return to a labile state that requires de novo protein synthesis for reconsolidation. These findings are not predicted by traditional theories of memory consolidation.

Cellular theories of memory consolidation posit that new memories require new protein synthesis in order to be stored. Systems consolidation theories posit that the hippocampus has a time-limited role in memory storage, after which the memory is independent of the hippocampus. Here, we show that intra-hippocampal infusions of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin caused amnesia for a consolidated hippocampal-dependent contextual fear memory, but only if the memory was reactivated prior to infusion. The effect occurred even if reactivation was delayed for 45 days after training, a time when contextual memory is independent of the hippocampus. Indeed, reactivation of a hippocampus-independent memory caused the trace to again become hippocampus dependent, but only for 2 days rather than for weeks. Thus, hippocampal memories can undergo reconsolidation at both the cellular and systems levels.

Phosphorylation of the α-subunit of initiation factor 2 (eIF2) controls protein synthesis by a conserved mechanism. In metazoa, distinct stress conditions activate different eIF2α kinases (PERK, PKR, GCN2, and HRI) that converge on phosphorylating a unique serine in eIF2α. This collection of signaling pathways is termed the ‘integrated stress response’ (ISR). eIF2α phosphorylation diminishes protein synthesis, while allowing preferential translation of some mRNAs. Starting with a cell-based screen for inhibitors of PERK signaling, we identified a small molecule, named ISRIB, that potently (IC50 = 5 nM) reverses the effects of eIF2α phosphorylation. ISRIB reduces the viability of cells subjected to PERK-activation by chronic endoplasmic reticulum stress. eIF2α phosphorylation is implicated in memory consolidation. Remarkably, ISRIB-treated mice display significant enhancement in spatial and fear-associated learning. Thus, memory consolidation is inherently limited by the ISR, and ISRIB releases this brake. As such, ISRIB promises to contribute to our understanding and treatment of cognitive disorders.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00498.001

Hyperconnectivity of neuronal circuits due to increased synaptic protein synthesis is postulated to cause Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is strongly implicated in ASD via upstream signaling. However, downstream regulatory mechanisms are ill-defined. We show that knockout (KO) of the eukaryotic translation Initiation Factor 4E-Binding Protein 2 (4E-BP2), an eIF4E-repressor downstream of mTOR, or eIF4E overexpression lead to increased translation of neuroligins, which are post-synaptic proteins that are causally linked to ASD. 4E-BP2-KO mice exhibit an increased ratio of excitatory to inhibitory synaptic inputs and autistic-like behaviors: social interaction deficits, altered communication and repetitive/stereotyped behaviors. Pharmacological inhibition of eIF4E activity or normalization of neuroligin 1, but not neuroligin 2 protein amounts, restore the normal excitation/inhibition ratio and rectify the social behavior deficits. Thus, translational control by eIF4E regulates the synthesis of neuroligins, maintaining the excitation to inhibition balance, and its dysregulation engenders ASD-like phenotypes.