In clinical use over a time-period of 2 years this combined form of therapy and motor function assessment was well accepted by participants. The active power output test and the spasticity test routine offered a proper tool to monitor participants' progress in functional rehabilitation and changes in spasticity.

No abstract

Push-rim wheelchair propulsion frequently causes severe upper limb injuries in people relying on the wheelchair for ambulation. To address this problem, we developed a novel handle-based wheelchair propulsion method that follows a cyclic motion within ergonomic joint ranges of motion. The aim of this study was to measure hand propulsion forces, joint excursions and net joint torques for this novel propulsion device and to compare its performance against traditional push-rim wheelchair propulsion. We hypothesized that under similar conditions, joint excursions of this novel handle-based device will remain within their ergonomic range and that the effectiveness of the propulsion forces will be higher, leading to lower average propulsion forces compared to push-rim propulsion and reducing the risk of injury.Eight paraplegic subjects propelled the new device at two different loads on a custom-made wheelchair-based test rig. Video motion capture and force sensors were used to monitor shoulder and wrist joint kinematics and kinetics. Shoulder and wrist loads were calculated using a modified upper-extremity Wheelchair Propulsion Model available in OpenSim.The results show that with this novel propulsion device joint excursions are within their recommended ergonomic ranges, resulting in a reduced range of motion of up to 30% at the shoulder and up to 80% at the wrist, while average resultant peak forces were reduced by up to 20% compared to push-rim propulsion. Furthermore, the lower net torques at both the shoulder and wrist demonstrate the potential of this novel propulsion system to reduce the risk of upper-extremity injuries.

Objective: To investigate differences in metabolic cost and gross mechanical efficiency of a novel handlebased wheelchair propulsion device and to compare its performance with conventional push-rim propulsion.Design: Double-group comparative study between 2 different propulsion methods.Participants: Eight paraplegic individuals and 10 non-disabled persons.Methods: Participants performed the same exercise using a push-rim device and the novel handle-based device on a wheelchair- based test rig. The exercise consisted of a combined submaximal and maximal test. Power output, oxygen uptake, ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio and heart rate were recorded continuously during the tests. Analysis of variance was performed to determine the effects of group, mode and on power output.Results: Submaximal exercise resulted in a higher efficiency for the novel device and significant main effects of propulsion mode on all investigated parameters, except heart rate. On the respiratory exchange ratio, a significant interaction effect was found for both mode and group. The maximal exercise resulted in a higher peak power output and lower peak heart rate during propulsion using the handle-based device. A significant main effect on mode for mean peak power output, ventilation and heart rate was also observed.Conclusion: Wheelchair propulsion using the handlebased device resulted in lower physical responses and higher mechanical efficiency, suggesting that this novel design may be well suited for indoor use, thereby offering an attractive alternative to pushrim wheelchairs.