No abstract

ublic health measures to limit the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include requirements not to leave home except for specified purposes, to work from home when practical, to limit proximity to other people, to not visit residential aged care homes, to limit the number of people at social events (weddings, funerals, celebrations), to restrict interstate and international travel, and to accept the enforcement of these restrictions. The mental health consequences of these measures are likely to be unevenly distributed across the community because they also depend on individual social and economic circumstances. A recent position paper 1 summarised international expert opinion on research priorities for mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. The first recommendation was to gather high quality population level data on its mental health effects. The aim of our study was to assess the mental health of people in Australia during the first month of COVID-19-related restrictions. Our specific objectives were to estimate population prevalence rates of clinically significant symptoms of depression, generalised anxiety, thoughts of being better off dead, increased irritability, and high optimism about the future; to estimate the prevalence of direct experiences of COVID-19, loss of employment caused by COVID-19 restrictions, concern about contracting COVID-19, and major disadvantage because of the restrictions; and to assess associations between these experiences and mental health symptoms. Methods A short, anonymous survey (estimated completion time, 8 minutes) of people living in Australia and aged at least 18 years was available on the Monash University website (https:// www.monash.edu/medic ine/living-with-covid-19-restr ictio nssurvey) from 3 April 2020 (four days after national stage two COVID-19 restrictions were announced by the Prime Minister; phase one restrictions had been gradually introduced during March) until midnight on 2/3 May 2020 (further information: online Supporting Information). Mental health Psychological symptoms experienced during the preceding fortnight were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). The PHQ-9 2 is an easily understood scale that asks respondents to rate their experience of nine symptoms from 0 (not experienced) to 3 (experienced nearly every day); a total PHQ-9 score of 10 or more indicates clinically significant (moderate to severe) symptoms, while scores of 5-9 indicate mild symptoms. The GAD-7 3 is an easily understood scale that asks respondents to rate their experience of seven symptoms of anxiety with the same response options as the PHQ-9; a total GAD-7 score of 10 or more indicate clinically significant (moderate to severe) symptoms, while scores of 5-9 indicate mild symptoms. Optimism about the future was assessed with a visual analogue scale (from 0, not at all optimistic, to 10, extremely optimistic).

Overall, this body of evidence is best described as emergent. It is possible that in pregnancy after ART, parenthood might be idealized and this might then hinder adjustment and the development of a confident parental identity.

Research concerning the psychosocial aspects of infertility and infertility treatment focuses more often on women than men. The aim of this review was to synthesize the English-language evidence related to the psychological and social aspects of infertility in men and discuss the implications of these reports for clinical care and future research. A structured search identified 73 studies that reported data concerning the desire for fatherhood and the psychological and social aspects of diagnosis, assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment and unsuccessful treatment among men with fertility difficulties. The studies are diverse in conceptualisation, design, setting and data collection, but the findings were reasonably consistent. These studies indicated that fertile and infertile childless men of reproductive age have desires to experience parenthood that are similar to those of their female counterparts; in addition, diagnosis and initiation of treatment are associated with elevated infertility-specific anxiety, and unsuccessful treatment can lead to a state of lasting sadness. However, rates of clinically significant mental health problems among this patient population are no higher than in the general population. Infertile men who are socially isolated, have an avoidant coping style and appraise stressful events as overwhelming, are more vulnerable to severe anxiety than men without these characteristics. Men prefer oral to written treatment information and prefer to receive emotional support from infertility clinicians rather than from mental health professionals, self-help support groups or friends. Nevertheless, structured, facilitated psycho-educational groups that are didactic but permit informal sharing of experiences might be beneficial. There are gaps in knowledge about factors governing seeking, persisting with and deciding to cease treatment; experiences of invasive procedures; parenting after assisted conception; adoption and infertility-related grief and shame among men. Few resource-constrained countries have any data concerning male experiences of infertility.