Data sharing is one of the cornerstones of modern science that enables large-scale analyses and reproducibility. We evaluated data availability in research articles across nine disciplines in Nature and Science magazines and recorded corresponding authors’ concerns, requests and reasons for declining data sharing. Although data sharing has improved in the last decade and particularly in recent years, data availability and willingness to share data still differ greatly among disciplines. We observed that statements of data availability upon (reasonable) request are inefficient and should not be allowed by journals. To improve data sharing at the time of manuscript acceptance, researchers should be better motivated to release their data with real benefits such as recognition, or bonus points in grant and job applications. We recommend that data management costs should be covered by funding agencies; publicly available research data ought to be included in the evaluation of applications; and surveillance of data sharing should be enforced by both academic publishers and funders. These cross-discipline survey data are available from the plutoF repository.

No abstract

No abstract

Antibacterial drug-loaded electrospun nano- and microfibrous dressings are of major interest as novel topical drug delivery systems in wound care. In this study, chloramphenicol (CAM)-loaded polycaprolactone (PCL) and PCL/poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) fiber mats were electrospun and characterized in terms of morphology, drug distribution, physicochemical properties, drug release, swelling, cytotoxicity, and antibacterial activity. Computational modeling together with physicochemical analysis helped to elucidate possible interactions between the drug and carrier polymers. Strong interactions between PCL and CAM together with hydrophobicity of the system resulted in much slower drug release compared to the hydrophilic ternary system of PCL/PEO/CAM. Cytotoxicity studies confirmed safety of the fiber mats to murine NIH 3T3 cells. Disc diffusion assay demonstrated that both fast and slow release fiber mats reached effective concentrations and had similar antibacterial activity. A biofilm formation assay revealed that both blank matrices are good substrates for the bacterial attachment and formation of biofilm. Importantly, prolonged release of CAM from drug-loaded fibers helps to avoid biofilm formation onto the dressing and hence avoids the treatment failure.