Person-centered aerobic and resistance exercise improved physical fitness in terms of aerobic capacity, endurance and strength in older adults with RA. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

BackgroundThe objective of the present study was to assess whether computer game-based training in the home setting in the late phase after stroke could improve upper extremity motor function.MethodsTwelve subjects with prior stroke were recruited; 11 completed the study.DesignThe study had a single subject design; there was a baseline test (A1), a during intervention test (B) once a week, a post-test (A2) measured directly after the treatment phase, plus a follow-up (C) 16–18 weeks after the treatment phase. Information on motor function (Fugl-Meyer), grip force (GrippitR) and arm function in activity (ARAT, ABILHAND) was gathered at A1, A2 and C. During B, only Fugl-Meyer and ARAT were measured. The intervention comprised five weeks of game-based computer training in the home environment. All games were designed to be controlled by either the affected arm alone or by both arms. Conventional formulae were used to calculate the mean, median and standard deviations. Wilcoxon’s signed rank test was used for tests of dependent samples. Continuous data were analyzed by methods for repeated measures and ordinal data were analyzed by methods for ordered multinomial data using cumulative logistic models. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsSix females and five males, participated in the study with an average age of 58 years (range 26–66). FMA-UE A-D (motor function), ARAT, the maximal grip force and the mean grip force on the affected side show significant improvements at post-test and follow-up compared to baseline. No significant correlation was found between the amount of game time and changes in the outcomes investigated in this study.ConclusionThe results indicate that computer game-based training could be a promising approach to improve upper extremity function in the late phase after stroke, since in this study, changes were achieved in motor function and activity capacity.

A method of breast reconstruction is based on the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) technique. Skin and fat are transplanted from the abdomen to the chest; blood vessels are reconnected through microsurgery. Nerves are, however, left unconnected. This study aims to evaluate the blood flow and reinnervation of blood vessels and skin in breasts reconstructed by DIEP flaps without neural repair. In all, DIEP flaps of 10 patients were tested at an average of 16.3 months postoperatively. Blood flow was assessed by PeriScan PIM II System, both before and after indirect heating. Tactile perception threshold was assessed by Semmes-Weinstein monofilament and thermal sensibility by SENSELab MSA Thermotest. The patients' contralateral breasts were used as controls. The blood flow of the flaps was statistically significantly lower than in the control breasts, both before and after indirect heating. The change in blood flow after indirect heating did, however, not significantly differ when comparing the breasts. All flaps regained deep pressure sensibility in all four quadrants. Five patients regained even better sensibility in one of their quadrants. Seven patients regained perception of cold stimuli, five perceived warmth. This study has shown that skin blood flow regulation is present in DIEP flaps 1 year after reconstruction. Blood flow dynamics are very similar to those in the normal breast. There is also a recovery of tactile and thermal sensibility, but this study has not shown any clear parallels between recovery blood flow, tactile sensibility and thermal sensibility.

Late chronic infection is a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and is often treated with surgery. The one-stage surgical procedure is believed to be the more advantageous from a patient and cost perspective, but there is no consensus on whether the one- or two-stage procedure is the better option. We analysed the risk for re-revision in infected primary THAs repaired with either the one- or two-stage method. Data was obtained from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the study groups were patients who had undergone a one-stage (n = 404) or two-stage (n = 1250) revision due to infection. Risk of re-revision was analysed using Kaplan–Meier analysis with log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. The cumulative survival rate was similar in the two groups at 15 years after surgery (p = 0.1). Adjusting for covariates, the risk for re-revision due to all causes did not differ between patients who were operated on with the one- or two-stage procedure (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.9, 95% Confidence Interval (C.I.) = 0.7–1.2, p = 0.5). The risk for re-revision due to infection (HR = 0.7m, 95% C.I. = 0.4–1.1, p = 0.2) and aseptic loosening (HR = 1.2, 95% C.I. = 0.8–1.8, p = 0.5) was similar. This study could not determine whether the one-stage method was inferior in cases when the performing surgeons chose to use the one-stage method.