IL-2 has been used for the treatment of melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, but this therapy has limited efficacy and severe toxicity. Currently, it is assumed that part of the limited efficacy is due to the IL-2–driven preferential expansion of regulatory T cells, which dampen the antitumor immunity. In this study, we characterize a human IL-2 mutant with higher antitumor efficacy and lower toxicity than wild type human IL-2 (wtIL-2). The mutant differs from wtIL-2 by four mutations at the interface with the α subunit of IL-2R. The IL-2 mutant induces in vitro proliferation of CD8+CD44hi and NK1.1 cells as efficiently as does wtIL-2, but it shows a reduced capacity to induce proliferation of CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. The IL-2 mutant shows a higher antimetastatic effect than does wtIL-2 in several transplantable tumor models: the experimental metastasis model of MB16F0 melanoma and the experimental and spontaneous metastasis models for the mouse pulmonary carcinoma 3LL-D1222. Relevantly, the IL-2 mutant also exhibits lower lung and liver toxicity than does wtIL-2 when used at high doses in mice. In silico simulations, using a calibrated mathematical model, predict that the properties of IL-2 mutein are a consequence of the reduction, of at least two orders of magnitude, in its affinity for the α subunit of IL-2R (CD25). The human IL-2 mutant described in the present work could be a good candidate for improving cancer therapy based on IL-2.

IL-2 is critical for peripheral tolerance mediated by regulatory T (Treg) cells, which represent an obstacle for effective cancer immunotherapy. Although IL-2 is important for effector (E) T cell function, it has been hypothesized that therapies blocking IL-2 signals weaken Treg cell activity, promoting immune responses. This hypothesis has been partially tested using anti-IL-2 or anti-IL-2R Abs with antitumor effects that cannot be exclusively attributed to lack of IL-2 signaling in vivo. In this work, we pursued an alternative strategy to block IL-2 signaling in vivo, taking advantage of the trimeric structure of the IL-2R. We designed an IL-2 mutant that conserves the capacity to bind to the αβ-chains of the IL-2R but not to the γ-chain, thus having a reduced signaling capacity. We show our IL-2 mutein inhibits IL-2 Treg cell-dependent differentiation and expansion. Moreover, treatment with IL-2 mutein reduces Treg cell numbers and impairs tumor growth in mice. A mathematical model was used to better understand the effect of the mutein on Treg and E T cells, suggesting suitable strategies to improve its design. Our results show that it is enough to transiently inhibit IL-2 signaling to bias E and Treg cell balance in vivo toward immunity.

Several reports in the literature have drawn a complex picture of the effect of treatments aiming to modulate IL2 activity in vivo. They seem to promote indistinctly immunity or tolerance, probably depending on the specific context, dose and timing of their application. Such complexity might derives from the dual role of IL2 on T-cell dynamics. To theoretically address the latter possibility, we develop a mathematical model for helper, regulatory and memory T-cells dynamics, which account for most well-known facts relative to their relationship with IL2. We simulate the effect of three types of therapies: IL2 injections, IL2 depletion using anti-IL2 antibodies and IL2/anti-IL2 immune complexes injection. We focus in the qualitative and quantitative conditions of dose and timing for these treatments which allow them to potentate either immunity or tolerance. Our results provide reasonable explanations for the existent pre-clinical and clinical data and further provide interesting practical guidelines to optimize the future application of these types of treatments. Particularly, our results predict that: (i) Immune complexes IL2/anti-IL2 mAbs, using mAbs which block the interaction of IL2 and CD25 (the alpha chain of IL2 receptor), is the best option to potentate immunity alone or in combination with vaccines. These complexes are optimal when a 1:2 molar ratio of mAb:IL2 is used and the mAbs have the largest possible affinity; (ii) Immune complexes IL2/anti-IL2 mAbs, using mAbs which block the interaction of IL2 and CD122 (the beta chain of IL2 receptor), are the best option to reinforce preexistent natural tolerance, for instance to prevent allograft rejection. These complexes are optimal when a 1:2 molar ratio of mAb:IL2 is used and the mAbs have intermediate affinities; (iii) mAbs anti-IL2 can be successfully used alone to treat an ongoing autoimmune disorder, promoting the re-induction of tolerance. The best strategy in this therapy is to start treatment with an initially high dose of the mAbs (one capable to induce some immune suppression) and then scales down slowly the dose of mAb in subsequent applications.

No abstract

Several reports in the literature have drawn a complex picture of the effect of treatments aiming to modulate IL2 activity in vivo. They seem to promote either immunity or tolerance, probably depending on the specific context, dose, and timing of their application. Such complexity might derive from the pleiotropic role of IL2 in T cell dynamics. To theoretically address the latter possibility, our group has developed several mathematical models for Helper, Regulatory, and Memory T cell population dynamics, which account for most well-known facts concerning their relationship with IL2. We have simulated the effect of several types of therapies, including the injection of: IL2; antibodies anti-IL2; IL2/anti-IL2 immune-complexes; and mutant variants of IL2. We studied the qualitative and quantitative conditions of dose and timing for these treatments which allow them to potentiate either immunity or tolerance. Our results provide reasonable explanations for the existent pre-clinical and clinical data, predict some novel treatments, and further provide interesting practical guidelines to optimize the future application of these types of treatments.