Gastroschisis is a common congenital abdominal wall defect. It is almost always diagnosed prenatally thanks to routine maternal serum screening and ultrasound screening programs. In the majority of cases, the condition is isolated (i.e. not associated with chromosomal or other anatomical anomalies). Prenatal diagnosis allows for planning the timing, mode and location of delivery. Controversies persist concerning the optimal antenatal monitoring strategy. Compelling evidence supports elective delivery at 37  weeks' gestation in a tertiary pediatric center. Cesarean section should be reserved for routine obstetrical indications. Prognosis of infants with gastroschisis is primarily determined by the degree of bowel injury, which is difficult to assess antenatally. Prenatal counseling usually addresses gastroschisis issues. However, parental concerns are mainly focused on long-term postnatal outcomes including gastrointestinal function and neurodevelopment. Although infants born with gastroschisis often endure a difficult neonatal course, they experience few long-term complications. This manuscript, which is structured around common parental questions and concerns, reviews the evidence pertaining to the antenatal, neonatal and long-term implications of a fetal gastroschisis diagnosis and is aimed at helping healthcare professionals counsel expecting parents.

Purpose Phyllodes tumors (PT) of the breast are rare fibroepithelial neoplasms. Information is controversial in the literature regarding to the optimal surgical management. Most studies suggested margins of at least 10 mm while some recent studies suggested narrower margins without an increased risk of local recurrences (LR) and distant metastases (DM). The objective of this systematic review was to identify and compare studies that assessed these different practices. Methods A systematic review was performed through five databases up to April 2019. Studies exploring the association between the width of margins, subtypes of PT, and the LR and DM rates were considered for inclusion. A statistical model for analyzing sparse data and rare events was used. Results Thirteen studies met eligibility criteria and were selected. Considering a threshold of 10 mm (margins < 10 vs margins ≥ 10 mm), the 5-year incidence rate of LR was estimated to be 5.22 vs. 3.63 (diff. −1.59) per 100 person-years for benign PT, 9.60 vs. 7.33 (diff. −2.27) for borderline PT, and 28.58 vs. 21.84 (diff. −6.74) for malignant PT. For DM, it was estimated to be 0.88 vs. 0.86 (diff. −0.02) for benign PT, 1.61 vs. 1.74 (diff. 0.13) for borderline PT, and 4.80 vs 5.18 (diff. 0.38) for malignant PT. The data for a threshold of 1 mm were not sufficient to draw any conclusions. Conclusion Irrespective of tumor grade, we found that DM was a rarer event than LR. Malignant PT had the highest incidence rate of LR and DM. This meta-analysis found a clear association between width of margins and LR rates. Whatever the tumor grade, surgical margins ≥ 10 mm guaranteed a lower risk of LR than margins < 10 mm. On the other hand, the width of margin did not influence the apparition of DM.

No abstract

Anal sphincter laceration is associated with urinary and anorectal incontinence, but symptoms improve or disappear in most cases and are globally not invalidating. Perineal physiotherapy seems to contribute to this positive evolution. Fertility rate among these patients is unaffected, but the CS rate is higher than average. Further consideration of sexual and emotional sequelae could improve our current service.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the evolution of high-grade cervical dysplasia during pregnancy and the postpartum period and to determine factors associated with dysplasia regression. Methods: Pregnant patients diagnosed with high-grade lesions were identified in our tertiary hospital center. High-grade lesions were defined either cytologically, by high squamous intraepithelial lesion/atypical squamous cells being unable to exclude HSIL (HSIL/ASC-H), or histologically, with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ (all CIN 2 and CIN 3) during pregnancy. Postpartum regression was defined cytologically or histologically by at least a one-degree reduction in severity from the antepartum diagnosis. A logistic regression model was applied to determine independent predictive factors for high-grade cervical dysplasia regression after delivery. Results: Between January 2000 and October 2017, 79 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. High-grade cervical lesions were diagnosed by cytology in 87% of cases (69/79) and confirmed by histology in 45% of those (31/69). The overall regression rate in our cohort was 43% (34/79). Univariate analysis revealed that parity (p = 0.04), diabetes (p = 0.04) and third trimester cytology (p = 0.009) were associated with dysplasia regression. Nulliparity (OR = 4.35; 95%CI = (1.03–18.42); p= 0.046) was identified by multivariate analysis as an independent predictive factor of high-grade dysplasia regression. The presence of HSIL on third-trimester cervical cytology (OR = 0.17; 95%CI = (0.04–0.72); p = 0.016) was identified as an independent predictive factor of high-grade dysplasia persistence at postpartum. Conclusion: Our regression rate was high, at 43%, for high-grade cervical lesions postpartum. Parity status may have an impact on dysplasia regression during pregnancy. A cervical cytology should be performed at the third trimester to identify patients at risk of CIN persistence after delivery. However, larger cohorts are required to confirm these results.