For the first time, the influence of different vine management was evaluated in relation to volatile profile and sensory perception through GC×GC/TOFMS, QDA, GC-FID, GC/MS, and GC-O. GC×GC/TOFMS analyses and QDA have shown that a larger spacing between vine rows (2 rather than 1m), attachment of shoots upwards, and irrigation did not result in wine improvement. Conversely, wines elaborated with grapes from a vine with a lower bud load (20 per plant; sample M1) stood out among the other procedures, rendering the most promising wine aroma. GC×GC/TOFMS allowed identification of 220 compounds including 26 aroma active compounds also distinguished by GC-O. Among them, eight volatiles were important to differentiate M1 from other wines, and five out of those eight compounds could only be correctly identified and quantified after separation in second dimension. Higher levels of three volatiles may explain the relation of M1 wine with red and dry fruits.

No abstract

No abstract

The validated method based on the use of headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with the comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection (GC×GC/TOFMS) proved to be appropriate for this first simultaneous quantitative determination of six toxic compounds (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, ethyl carbamate, furan, furfural and acrolein) found in wines. Acetaldehyde and acrolein coeluted with other wine compounds, which indicated that difficulties could arise if only one-dimensional gas chromatography was used for the determination of these compounds. The advancement of the ripeness degree and increasing the grape maceration time seems to result in higher concentrations of toxic compounds. The exposure to furan, acrolein and ethyl carbamate through wine consumption may pose risks to consumer health, since calculated MOE values were lower than 10,000.

No abstract