No abstract

Background To determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in children receiving a blended diet via a gastrostomy tube. Methods This is a single‐center, retrospective study of children ages 1–18 years that received a blended diet. We reviewed demographics, anthropometrics, clinical characteristics, and rationale for switching to blended diet. Fixed‐effects logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the changes in patient symptoms over the 12‐month follow‐up period, and fixed‐effects regression was employed to test for changes in anthropometrics. Results Twenty‐three patients (8 female, 15 male) were identified, and data from 89 outpatient visits were analyzed. The most common underlying diagnosis was neurological disorder. Thirty‐five percent of patients received commercial whole cow milk formulas, 30% received hydrolysate formulas, and 35% received amino acid−based formulas. After formula switches were made, 65% received homemade blended diets, 17.5% received commercial blended diets, and 17.5% received a combination of both. Median duration of time on a blended diet was 17 months. Ninety‐five percent of patients who were previously experiencing upper GI symptoms improved within the first 3 months after blended diet initiation. Twenty‐one percent of patients developed mild constipation on the diet, which was managed with increased water intake and/or polyethylene glycol. Only 2 patients discontinued the blended diet, because of inadequate weight gain and worsening of upper GI symptoms. Conclusions In our study population, blended diets were well tolerated in gastrostomy‐fed children and were associated with clinical improvement of upper GI symptoms.

Infection with gastrointestinal nematodes exerts profound effects on both the immune and physiological responses of the host. We showed previously that the Th2 cytokines, IL-4 and IL-13, induce STAT6-dependent changes in intestinal epithelial cell permeability, absorption, and secretion that are similar to those observed in a secondary infection with Heligmosomoides polygyrus. In the current study we investigated whether nematode-induced effects on epithelial cell function were 1) generic, 2) dependent upon STAT6, and 3) attributable to direct effects on the epithelial cells themselves or mediated by effects on enteric nerves. Our results demonstrate that infection of BALB/c mice with three different gastrointestinal nematodes (H. polygyrus, Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, and Trichinella spiralis) alters intestinal epithelial cell function by decreasing resistance, glucose absorption, and secretory responses to 5-hydroxytryptamine and acetylcholine, two critical mediators in the submucosal reflex pathway. These modified responses are dependent on STAT6 and are the result of both direct effects and indirect effects mediated through enteric nerves.

Objectives: This study aims to identify factors specific to the COVID-19 pandemic that affect resident physicians’ well-being, identify potential sources of anxiety, and assess for depression and stress among residents. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was performed in April 2020 that evaluated resident perceptions about COVID-19 pandemic, its impact on their personal lifestyle, and coping mechanisms adopted. The respondents also completed the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and Cohen Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). Results: Of 37 residents, 29 completed the survey for a response rate of 78%. We found that 50% of residents harbored increased anxiety due to the pandemic and reported fears of spreading disease. Factors that negatively impacted their well-being included social isolation from colleagues (78%), inability to engage in outdoor activities (82%), and social gatherings (86%). Residents expressed concern about the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on their didactic education and clinical rotations. The mean PSS-10 total score was 17 (SD = 4.96, range = 0-33) and the mean BDI-II total score was 6.79 (SD = 6.00). Our residents adopted a number of coping mechanisms in response to COVID-19. Conclusions: We identified factors specific to the COVID-19 pandemic that adversely affected resident physician well-being. Trainees were concerned about the risk of developing COVID-19 and spreading this to their family. Residents also harbored anxiety regarding the effect of COVID-19 on their education. Lifestyle changes including social isolation also resulted in a negative effect on resident well-being. Developing strategies and resources directed to addressing these concerns may help support well-being and alleviate stress and anxiety.