Severe peripheral artery disease requires revascularization to relieve life-limiting ischemic symptoms. Postrevascularization in-stent restenosis continues to be a problem after femoropopliteal procedures. Our aim was to evaluate the use of cilostazol to prevent in-stent restenosis among patients with lower extremity arterial stenting. We performed a MEDLINE and EMBASE search and reviewed the abstracts and manuscripts following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The primary efficacy outcome was patency rate after stenting. The odds ratio estimates were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects method. We identified 524 studies, and 20 articles were fully abstracted and 4 were included in the meta-analysis. The total number of patients included was 2434. Patients in the cilostazol group had better primary patency rates after endovascular stenting than those not taking cilostazol (odds ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.71). The use of cilostazol appears to prevent in-stent restenosis of high-risk patients.

Objective: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with two to six fold increase in the cardiovascular mortality. Revascularization is indicated to relieve life limiting ischemic symptoms and improve wound healing. Primary patency for balloon angioplasty has been reported to be around 40 to 60% in the first year[8]. Stents have improved rates of primary patency but long-term patency rates are not comparable to bypass surgery, with many patients at high risk of in-stent restenosis. Many adjunctive therapies have been proposed to reduce the high restenosis rate. Our aim is to evaluate the use of cilostazol to prevent in-stent restenosis among patients with lower extremity arterial stenting. Methods: We performed a MEDLINE and EMBASE search, and reviewed the abstracts and manuscripts following the PRISMA guidelines. Patency rate after stenting was the primary efficacy outcome. At least 2 abstractors reviewed the study list and selected manuscripts. We calculated Q statistic and a homogeneity formal test. The odds ratio (OR) estimates were pooled by using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects method. Data were analyzed using the R META package Results: We identified 524 studies, 20 articles were fully abstracted and 4 included in the metaanalysis. The total number of patients was 2434. The cilostazol and control groups were evenly divided. All studies were of moderate quality. Clinical characteristics including age and BMI were similar in the two groups. Stents were placed to treat de novo lesions. Two of the studies compared cilostazol to ticlopidine. Cilostazol group patients had better primary patency rates after endovascular therapy than patients not taking cilostazol (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.43 - 0.71). Heterogeneity was moderate with I2 of 38% and of moderate clinical relevance not statistically significant thus random effect model was kept. Omitting a single study did not affect the overall odds ratio of the other studies. Funnel plot suggested no publication bias. Conclusions: In stent stenosis among revascularized patients with PAD was 45% lower for patients who were on cilostazol.

Las náuseas y vómitos (NyV) constituyen dos de los efectos adversos frecuentemente asociados a la administración de quimioterapia además de otros fármacos empleados en hematología. La importancia que la prevención y el manejo de estos síntomas tiene en nuestros pacientes, radica en los riesgos que representan cuando no son tratados correctamente como por ejemplo: deshidratación, alteraciones hidroelectrolíticas e insuficiencia renal aguda. Para la elaboración este artículo se realizó una revisión de la literatura en función de la evidencia y esquemas disponibles para la prevención y tratamiento de NV inducido por medicamentos usados en el manejo de pacientes con patologías hematológicas.