No abstract

Pravo neosnovanog obogaćenja nezavisna je grana obligacionog prava koja se zbog svog razvoja u istoriji do neke mere preklapa sa drugim oblastima civilnog prava -deliktnim, stvarnim i ugovornim pravom te poslovodstvom bez naloga. Upravo zbog toga se često postavlja pitanje odnosa ugovornih zahteva prema zahtevima po drugim pravnim osnovama. Rad se bavi pitanjem da li je zahtev iz neosnovanog obogaćenja u odnosu na ugovorno, deliktno i stvarno pravo supsidijarnog karaktera i da li je isključen ukoliko poverilac ima mogućnost da podnese zahtev po drugačijoj, specijalizovanoj pravnoj osnovi. U raspravi se, koja slovenačko pravo stavlja u središte i analizira ga u svetlu rešenja odabranih stranih pravnih sistema, razmatraju različite varijante principa supsidijarnosti te uloga i značaj prava neosnovanog obogaćenja u sistemu građanskog prava.

No abstract

If one person is enriched at the expense of another and there is no legal ground for retaining this enrichment, the law imposes an obligation of restitution upon the unjustly enriched recipient, which is subject to various defences. One of them is the defence that the defendant is no longer enriched (change of position). The Slovenian Code of Obligations does not contain an express general defence of change of position. However, there is a special provision, which allows a bona fide recipient of compensation for personal injury to rely on disenrichment if it subsequently turns out that the compensation was without valid legal basis. The paper examines whether disenrichment is inherent to the law of unjustified enrichment as a way of measuring liability, and consequently should the change of position defence be generally recognised, even though there is no provision allowing it in the Code or settled case law on this matter.