Introduction: Plasma concentrations of gut microbial metabolites are associated with cardiomyocyte viability and platelet reactivity. We hypothesized that increased concentrations of gut metabolites may predict major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Aim: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the association between elevated plasma concentrations of gut metabolites and MACCE after AMI.Material and methods: We compared plasma concentrations of gut metabolites (trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) and indoxyl sulphate (IS)) and platelet reactivity in 57 patients with AMI and 27 healthy controls. We assessed the predictive value of gut metabolites for MACCE (stroke, recurrent AMI, death) over a median of 3.5-years.Results: The concentrations of TMAO and IS did not differ between AMI patients and controls. The concentrations of TMAO and IS were higher in patients who developed MACCE than in those who did not (p ≤ 0.015 for all). The concentration of TMAO was the only independent predictor of MACCE in a multivariate analysis (OR = 35.041, 95% CI: 1.269-967.307, p = 0.036). Patients with the concentration of TMAO and indoxyl sulphate above the cut-off value predictive of MACCE had higher platelet activity (p ≤ 0.149 for all).Conclusions: Increased plasma concentration of TMAO is an independent predictor of MACCE and may contribute to post-AMI cardiac dysfunction.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and its complications remain the main cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Patients with extensive CAD and multiple comorbidities who require complex, high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR‐PCI) are at risk of haemodynamic instability and may require short‐term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) during the procedure to maintain sufficient perfusion and prevent ischaemia. Impella is a microaxial continuous blood flow pump used for percutaneous support of the left ventricle in patients undergoing HR‐PCI. Data from randomized controlled trials and registries suggested an advantage for Impella devices in patients undergoing HR‐PCI, compared with other types of MCS. As a thorough understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of the Impella technology is crucial for patient outcomes, we provide a technological overview of Impella and share our experiences gathered during the implementation of institutional Impella programmes in Poland as a roadmap of selection and periprocedural care for patients treated with Impella in the setting of HR‐PCI. We propose 10 steps for implementation of an institutional Impella programme for HR‐PCI, including (i) dedicated staff training; (ii) standard operating procedure and troubleshooting algorithms prior to the first intervention; (iii) patient selection by the multidisciplinary Heart Team; (iv) patient preparation using multimodality imaging; (v) procedure planning in terms of large‐bore access, equipment, and complete revascularization; (vi) starting with HR‐PCI support; (vii) starting with femoral artery access in a patient without extensive peripheral artery disease; (viii) multidisciplinary care after the procedure; (ix) haemodynamic and laboratory monitoring to ensure immediate diagnosis of access‐site complications, bleeding, haemolysis, acute kidney injury, and infections; and (x) careful revision of every HR‐PCI case with the team.

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a sudden, life-threatening condition, defined as a gradual or rapid onset of symptoms and/or signs of HF. AHF requires urgent medical attention, being the most frequent cause of unplanned hospital admission in patients above 65 years of age. AHF is associated with a 4-12% in-hospital mortality rate and a 21-35% 1-year mortality rate post-discharge. Considering the serious prognosis in AHF patients, it is very important to understand the mechanisms and haemodynamic status in an individual AHF patient, thus preventing end-organ failure and death. Haemodynamic monitoring is a serial assessment of cardiovascular function, intended to detect physiologic abnormalities at the earliest stages, determine which interventions could be most effective, and provide the basis for initiating the most appropriate therapy and evaluate its effects. Over the past decades, haemodynamic monitoring techniques have evolved greatly. Nowadays, they range from very invasive to non-invasive, from intermittent to continuous, and in terms of the provided parameters. Invasive techniques contain pulmonary artery catheterization and transpulmonary thermodilution. Minimally invasive techniques include oesophageal Doppler and noncalibrated pulse wave analysis. Non-invasive techniques contain echocardiography, bioimpedance, and bioreactance techniques as well as non-invasive pulse contour methods. Each of these techniques has specific indications and limitations. In this article, we aimed to provide a pathophysiological explanation of the physical terms and parameters used for haemodynamic monitoring in AHF and to summarize the working principles, advantages, and disadvantages of the currently used methods of haemodynamic monitoring.

Background Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERTs) were established to individualize the treatment of high-risk (HR) and intermediate-high-risk (IHR) pulmonary embolism (PE) patients, which pose a challenge in clinical practice. Methods We retrospectively collected the data of all HR and IHR acute PE patients consulted by PERT CELZAT between September 2017 and October 2022. The patient population was divided into four different treatment methods: anticoagulation alone (AC), systemic thrombolysis (ST), surgical embolectomy (SE), and catheter-directed therapies (CDTx). Baseline clinical characteristics, risk stratification, PE severity parameters, and treatment outcomes were compared between the four groups. Results Of the 110 patients with HR and IHR PE, 67 (61%) patients were treated with AC only, 11 (10%) with ST, 15 (14%) underwent SE, and 17 (15%) were treated with CTDx. The most common treatment option in the HR group was reperfusion therapy, used in 20/24 (83%) cases, including ST in 7 (29%) patients, SE in 5 (21%) patients, and CTDx in 8 (33%) patients. In contrast, IHR patients were treated with AC alone in 63/86 (73%) cases. The in-hospital mortality rate was 9/24 (37.5%) in the HR group and 4/86 (4.7%) in the IHR group. Conclusions The number of advanced procedures aimed at reperfusion was substantially higher in the HR group than in the IHR PE group. Despite the common use of advanced reperfusion techniques in the HR group, patient mortality remained high. There is a need further to optimize the treatment of patients with HR PE to improve outcomes.

Mitral valve dysfunction affects around 2% of the population and its incidence is still increasing, making it the second most common valvular heart disease, after aortic stenosis. Depending on the etiology of the disease, it can be classified into primary or secondary mitral regurgitation. The first line of treatment is optimal medical therapy. If ineffective, mitral valve intervention can be considered. For patients disqualified from surgical treatment, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the use of MitraClip may be considered. Over 100,000 MitraClip procedures have been performed which makes this the most established transcatheter technique for the treatment of severe mitral regurgitation. The aim of this review is to discuss the technical details of the MitraClip procedure, clinical evidence regarding the efficacy of MitraClip, complications related to the clip implantation alongside with acute complications based on the currently available evidence and clinical experience.