Background Combination therapy in the treatment of sepsis, especially the value of combining a β-Lactam antibiotic with an aminoglycoside, has been discussed. This retrospective cohort study including patients with sepsis or septic shock aimed to investigate whether one single dose of gentamicin at admittance (SGA) added to β-Lactam antibiotic could result in a lower risk of mortality than β-Lactam monotherapy, without exposing the patient to the risk of nephrotoxicity. Methods and findings All patients with positive blood cultures were evaluated for participation (n = 1318). After retrospective medical chart review, a group of patients with community-acquired sepsis with positive blood cultures who received β-Lactam antibiotic with or without the addition of SGA (n = 399) were included for the analysis. Mean age was 74.6 yrs. (range 19-98) with 216 (54%) males. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA score) median was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-5) and the median Charlson Comorbidity Index for the whole group was 2 (IQR 1-3). Sixty-seven (67) patients (17%) had septic shock. The 28-day mortality in the combination therapy group was 10% (20 of 197) and in the monotherapy group 22% (45 of 202), adjusted HR 3.5 (95% CI (1.9-6.2), p = < 0.001. No significant difference in incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was detected. Conclusion This retrospective observational study including patients with community-acquired sepsis or septic shock and positive blood cultures, who meet Sepsis-3 criteria, shows that the addition
Background Blood stream infection (BSI), and especially sepsis and septic shock, is associated with high mortality and significant morbidity. The visible, clinical signs can vary from patient to patient depending on several factors. NEWS2 is quick, easy and non-invasive and includes bedside measurable vital signs. Although NEWS2 is recommended as a risk-stratifying and identification tool in patients with suspected sepsis, it is not a sepsis-specific score. Correlations between vital signs and bacterial species found in blood cultures have not been sufficiently investigated. An early and clear signal through the NEWS2 score could be useful especially in those patients with infections caused by common bacteria rendering high mortality and morbidity. The primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of NEWS2 to detect sepsis in adult patients with positive blood cultures caused by community-acquired infections. A secondary aim was to study a possible association between NEWS2 score and different bacterial species. Method This is a retrospective observational study. All patients with positive blood cultures were evaluated for participation (n = 1318). After retrospective medical chart review, 555 patients were eligible for inclusion. Positive NEWS2-score indicating sepsis was defined as NEWS2 ≥ 5. Results The presence of sepsis according to SOFA-score was 425 of 555, 76.6% and 28 days mortality was 67 of 555, 12.1%. The sensitivity of NEWS2 to detect sepsis was 87% (95% CI 0.83–0.90). Most common pathogens were Escherichia coli 35.1%, followed by Staphylococcus aureus 15.7% and Streptococcus pneumoniae 13.0%. The ability of NEWS2 to predict sepsis was not statistically associated with the etiology of the infection. The specificity of NEWS2 detection of sepsis was low, 52% (95% CI 0.43–0.59) with no statistically significant differences observed between pathogens. Conclusions Patients attending the Emergency Department (ED) with positive blood cultures and NEWS2 score ≥ 5 presented an overall sensitivity of 87% and PPV of 85% to detect patients with sepsis defined by Sepsis-3 criteria. NEWS2 score ≥ 5 could be considered as a quick, first screening tool to highlight a high likelihood of sepsis in the ED. However, NEWS2 score could not discriminate different bacterial species causing the sepsis episode.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.