Purpose Free flaps have become the standard option in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. Even though many authors have outlined the reliability of free transplants, there is an ongoing discussion about treatment options for patients bearing particular risks as previous irradiation treatment. In this analysis, we aim to address these patients with particular risk profiles by comparing different flap entity outcome parameters. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 494 patients who underwent flap surgery between 2009 and 2018 in our department. Focusing on free microvascular transplants, we additionally analyzed the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap as the most frequently used vascular pedicled flap. Data analysis was performed by uni-and multivariate statistics. Results Overall flap success rate was 90%, with the radial forearm flap occurring to be most reliable (93%) in head and neck reconstruction. Previous radiation therapy (RT) and intraoperative revision of vascular anastomosis during primary surgery significantly resulted in impaired transplant outcome with a success rate of 91.8% (no RT) vs. 83.7% (RT), respectively. There was a negative linear correlation between incision to suture time and number of flaps per year (R 2 = 0.67). Conclusions Preoperative radiation therapy and intraoperative revision of anastomosis significantly impair outcome of microvascular flaps in the head and neck and oral cavity, whereas patient's age is not a predictor of flap failure. Increasing case number and experience reduces time of flap surgery as well as rate of complications and flap failure.

Purpose To assess precise topographic changes of the breast, objective documentation and evaluation of pre- and postoperative results are crucial. New technologies for mapping the body using digital, three-dimensional surface measurements have offered novel ways to numerically assess the female breast. Due to the lack of clear demarcation points of the breast contour, the selection of landmarks on the breast is highly dependent on the examiner, and, therefore, is prone to error when conducting before-after comparisons of the same breast. This study describes an alternative to volumetric measurements, focusing on topographic changes of the female breast, based on three-dimensional scans. Method The study was designed as an interventional prospective study of 10 female volunteers who had planned on having aesthetic breast augmentation with anatomical, textured implants. Three dimensional scans of the breasts were performed intraoperatively, first without and then with breast implants. The topographic change was determined as the mean distance between two three-dimensional layers before and after augmentation. This mean distance is defined as the Topographic Shift. Results The mean implant volume was 283 cc (SD = 68.6 cc, range = 210–395 cc). The mean Topographic Shift was 7.4 mm (SD = 1.9 mm, range = 4.8–10.7 mm). The mean Topographic Shifts per quadrant were: I: 8.0 mm (SD = 3.3 mm); II: 9.2 mm (SD = 3.1 mm); III: 6.9 mm (SD = 3.5 mm); IV: 1.9 mm (SD = 4.3 mm). Conclusion The Topographic Shift, describing the mean distance between two three-dimensional layers (for example before and after a volume changing therapy), is a new approach that can be used for assessing topographic changes of a body area. It was found that anatomical, textured breast implants cause a topographic change, particularly on the upper breast, in quadrant II, the décolleté.

Background Reactogenicity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines can result in inability to work. The object of this study was to evaluate health care workers’ sick leave after COVID-19 vaccination and to compare it with sick leave due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and quarantine leave. Methods A multi-center cross-sectional survey was conducted at Regensburg University Medical Center and ten teaching hospitals in South-East Germany from July 28th to October 15th 2021. Results Of 2662 participants, 2309 (91.8%) were fully vaccinated without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sick leave after first/second vaccination occurred in 239 (10.4%) and 539 (23.3%) participants. In multivariable logistic regression, the adjusted odds ratio for sick leave after first/second vaccination compared to BNT162b2 was 2.26/3.72 for mRNA-1237 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-4.01/1.99-6.96) and 27.82/0.48 for ChAdOx1-S (95% CI 19.12-40.48/0.24-0.96). The actual median sick leave was one day (interquartile range (IQR) 0-2) after any vaccination. 251 participants (9.4%) reported a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection (median sick leave 14 days, IQR 10-21), 353 (13.3%) were quarantined at least once (median quarantine leave 14 days, IQR 10-14). Sick leave due to SARS-CoV-2 infection (4642 days) and quarantine leave (4710 days) accounted for 7.7 times more loss of workforce than actual sick leave after first and second vaccination (1216 days) in all fully vaccinated participants. Conclusions Sick leave after COVID-19 vaccination is frequent and associated with the vaccine applied. COVID-19 vaccination should reduce the much higher proportion of loss of workforce due to SARS-CoV-2 infection and quarantine.

BACKGROUND A fracture of the acetabulum is an uncommon, but serious injury. Established outcome tools do not reflect the patient’s perspective after fracture of the hip joint. Originally designed for post-arthroplasty patients, the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) tool evaluating the disease-specific health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). AIM To validate the FJS in patients after acetabular fracture. METHODS In a prospective mono-centric cohort study, we evaluated 100 patients at mean 5.2 ± 3.6 years after a fracture of the acetabulum. The validation study followed the complete COSMIN checklist protocol. For calculation of convergent validity, we used the Tegner-Activity Scale, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the EuroQol-5D, and a subjective rating of change as an anchor variable. RESULTS We confirmed good internal consistency with a Cronbach‘s alpha of 0.95. With an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 (95%CI: 0.97, 0.99), test-retest reliability of the FJS was excellent. Correlation coefficients between the questionnaires were moderate to high ranging from |0.56| to |0.83| (absolute value). No relevant floor or ceiling effects occurred. Standard error of measurement was 3.2 and smallest detectable change (SDC) was 8.8. Thus, changes greater than 8.8 points between two assessments denote a real change in FJS. CONCLUSION The FJS is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of patient-reported outcome in posttraumatic condition after acetabular fracture. The SDC indicating a real clinical improvement was 8.8 points in the FJS. We could confirm responsiveness of the FJS and found no relevant floor- or ceiling effects.

The successful treatment of knee osteoarthritis can restore postural stability to the level of the unaffected side-independent from the implanted devices and with preservation of soft tissue and bone stock. Superior postural stability in joint-preserving patient-specific interpositional knee devices compared with total knee arthroplasty had to be attributed to the different age of both groups.