Introduction Ovarian cancer (OC) represents a serious disease with high mortality and lack of efficient predictive and prognostic biomarkers. ATP‐binding cassette (ABC) proteins constitute a large family dedicated to active transmembrane transport including transport of xenobiotics. Materials and methods mRNA level was measured by quantitative RT‐PCR in tumor tissues from OC patients. Bioinformatics analyses were applied to two gene expression datasets (60 primary tumors and 29 peritoneal metastases). Two different approaches of expression data normalization were applied in parallel, and their results were compared. Data from publically available cancer datasets were checked to further validate our conclusions. Results The results showed significant connections between ABC gene expression profiles and time to progression (TTP), chemotherapy resistance, and metastatic progression in OC. Two consensus ABC gene profiles with clinical meaning were documented. (a) Downregulation of ABCC4, ABCC10, ABCD3, ABCE1, ABCF1, ABCF2, and ABCF3 was connected with the best sensitivity to chemotherapy and TTP. (b) Oppositely, downregulation of ABCB11 and upregulation of ABCB1 and ABCG2 were connected with the worst sensitivity to chemotherapy and TTP. Results from publicly available online databases supported our conclusions. Conclusion This study stressed the connection between two well‐documented ABC genes and clinicopathological features—ABCB1 and ABCG2. Moreover, we showed a comparable connection also for several other ABC genes—ABCB11, ABCC4, ABCC10, ABCD3, ABCE1, ABCF1, ABCF2, and ABCF3. Our results add new clinically relevant information to this oncology field and can stimulate further exploration.

Silychristin A is the second most abundant compound of silymarin. Silymarin complex was previously described as an antioxidant with multidrug resistance modulation activity. Here, the results of a classical biochemical antioxidant assay (ORAC) were compared with a cellular assay evaluating the antioxidant capacity of pure silychristin A and its derivatives (anhydrosilychristin, isosilychristin and 2,3-dehydrosilychristin A). All the tested compounds acted as antioxidants within the cells, but 2,3-dehydro- and anhydro derivatives were almost twice as potent as the other tested compounds. Similar results were obtained in LPS-stimulated macrophages, where 2,3-dehydro- and anhydrosilychristin inhibited NO production nearly twice as efficiently as silychristin A. The inhibition of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) was determined in vitro, and the respective sensitization of doxorubicin-resistant ovarian carcinoma overproducing P-gp was detected. Despite the fact that the inhibition of P-gp was demonstrated in a concentration-dependent manner for each tested compound, the sensitization of the resistant cell line was observed predominantly for silychristin A and 2,3-dehydrosilychristin A. However, anhydrosilychristin and isosilychristin affected the expression of both the P-gp (ABCB1) and ABCG2 genes. This is the first report showing that silychristin A and its 2,3-dehydro-derivative modulate multidrug resistance by the direct inhibition of P-gp, in contrast to anhydrosilychristin and isosilychristin modulating multidrug resistance by downregulating the expression of the dominant transmembrane efflux pumps.

There is ample evidence for the essential involvement of DNA repair and DNA damage response in the onset of solid malignancies, including ovarian cancer. Indeed, high-penetrance germline mutations in DNA repair genes are important players in familial cancers: BRCA1, BRCA2 mutations or mismatch repair, and polymerase deficiency in colorectal, breast, and ovarian cancers. Recently, some molecular hallmarks (e.g., TP53, KRAS, BRAF, RAD51C/D or PTEN mutations) of ovarian carcinomas were identified. The manuscript overviews the role of DNA repair machinery in ovarian cancer, its risk, prognosis, and therapy outcome. We have attempted to expose molecular hallmarks of ovarian cancer with a focus on DNA repair system and scrutinized genetic, epigenetic, functional, and protein alterations in individual DNA repair pathways (homologous recombination, non-homologous end-joining, DNA mismatch repair, base- and nucleotide-excision repair, and direct repair). We suggest that lack of knowledge particularly in non-homologous end joining repair pathway and the interplay between DNA repair pathways needs to be confronted. The most important genes of the DNA repair system are emphasized and their targeting in ovarian cancer will deserve further attention. The function of those genes, as well as the functional status of the entire DNA repair pathways, should be investigated in detail in the near future.