Background: The comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in older myocardial infarction (MI) patients has received limited study. Methods: We performed an observational analysis of all patients ≥80 years (n=14005) who were discharged alive with aspirin combined with either clopidogrel (60.2%) or ticagrelor (39.8%) after a MI between 2010 and 2017 registered in the national registry Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART). Inverse probability treatment weighting was used in Cox regression models to adjust for differences in demographics, in-hospital therapies, and medications. The primary ischemic outcome (death, MI or stroke), and bleeding were obtained from national registries at 1 year. A sensitivity analysis in <80-year-old patients was performed. Results: In patients ≥80 years, the incidence of the primary ischemic outcome (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.06) was similar for ticagrelor- and clopidogrel-treated patients. Ticagrelor was associated with a 17% and 48% higher risk of death (1.17 (1.03- 1.32)) and bleeding (1.48 (1.25- 1.76)), but a lower risk of MI (0.80 (0.70- 0.92)) and stroke (0.72 (0.56-0.93)). In <80-year-old patients the incidence of the primary ischemic outcome was 17% (0.83 (0.77-0.89)) lower with ticagrelor. Ticagrelor was associated with 15% (0.85 (0.76-0.96)) lower risk of death, 32% higher risk of bleeding (1.32 (1.18-1.47)), but lower risk of MI (0.82 (0.75-0.91)) and stroke (0.82 (0.69-0.98)). Conclusions: Ticagrelor use among elderly MI patients was associated with higher risk of bleeding and death compared with clopidogrel. A randomized study of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in the elderly is needed.

No abstract

No abstract