PurposeWhile many programs have demonstrated pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship successes in inpatient and emergency department (ED) settings, there is a paucity of literature exploring these initiatives in urgent care (UC) sites. This study aimed to determine the impact of implementing a pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) in the UC setting.MethodsA retrospective quasi-experimental study was conducted evaluating UC patients with positive urine or wound cultures following discharge. A collaborative practice agreement was implemented in 2015 allowing for pharmacist-led UC culture follow-up via a stewardship-focused protocol. The primary outcome of this study was to compare guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing between the pre-ASP and post-ASP groups. Secondary outcomes included comparing the number of patients who required follow-up, time to follow-up, UC or ED revisits within 72 hours, and hospital admission within 30 days between groups.ResultsA total of 300 patients were included in the study (pre-ASP, n = 150; post-ASP, n = 150). Total guideline-concordant prescribing for all diagnoses was significantly improved in the post-ASP group (pre-ASP, 41.3% versus post-ASP 53.3%, p = 0.037). Additionally, guideline-concordant antibiotic selection improved in the post-ASP group (pre-ASP, 51% versus post-ASP, 68%, p = 0.01). Follow-up was required for 27 (18%) patients in the pre-ASP group compared with 16 (10.7%) in the post-ASP group (p = 0.07). Median time to follow-up call was longer in the post-ASP group (38 versus 71 hours, p < 0.001). There were no differences in UC and ED revisits within 72 hours (p = 1.0) or hospital admissions within 30 days (p = 0.723).ConclusionA pharmacist-led urgent care ASP was associated with significantly improved guideline-concordant antimicrobial prescribing.

No abstract

Prolonged turnaround time of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) test results may delay time to notification and treatment of test-positive patients and result in unnecessary antimicrobial use in test-negative patients. This quasi-experimental study evaluated the impact of NG/CT rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) in an urban emergency department (ED) on treatment appropriateness, time to notification, and cost. Patients tested in December 2013-January 2014 (traditional group, n=200) were compared with those in December 2014-January 2015 (RDT group, n=200). There was a significant increase in treatment appropriateness in the RDT group, 72.5% versus 60% (P=0.008) and time to results notification was significantly faster (median 17.4 versus 51.5hours, P=0.010). Availability of test result prior to discharge was associated with increased treatment appropriateness (odds ratio, 22.65 [95% confidence interval, 2.86-179.68]). The RDT would save approximately $37,000 annually. These results support the use of NG/CT RDT to expand antimicrobial stewardship efforts within the ED.

The EMP involvement in initial stroke care was associated with a significant improvement in DTN time.

IntroductionUrgent care centers represent a high-volume outpatient setting where antibiotics are prescribed frequently but resources for antimicrobial stewardship may be scarce. In 2015, our pharmacist-led Emergency Department (ED) culture follow-up program was expanded to include two urgent care (UC) sites within the same health system. The UC program is conducted by ED and infectious diseases clinical pharmacists as well as PGY1 pharmacy residents using a collaborative practice agreement (CPA). The purpose of this study was to describe the pharmacist-led UC culture follow-up program and its impact on pharmacist workload.MethodsThis retrospective, descriptive study included all patients discharged to home from UC with a positive culture from any site resulting between 1 January and 31 December 2016. Data collected included the culture type, presence of intervention, and proportion of interventions made under the CPA. Additionally, pharmacist workload was reported as the number of call attempts made, new prescriptions written, and median time to complete follow-up per patient. Data were reported using descriptive statistics.ResultsA total of 1461 positive cultures were reviewed for antibiotic appropriateness as part of the UC culture follow-up program, with 320 (22%) requiring follow-up intervention. Culture types most commonly requiring intervention were urine cultures (25%) and sexually transmitted diseases (25%). A median of 15 min was spent per intervention, with a median of one call (range 1–6 calls) needed to reach each patient. Less than half of patients required a new antimicrobial prescription at follow-up.ConclusionA pharmacist-led culture follow-up program conducted using a CPA was able to be expanded to UC sites within the same health system using existing clinical pharmacy staff along with PGY1 pharmacy residents. Service expansion resulted in minimal increase in pharmacist workload. Adding UC culture follow-up services to an existing ED program can allow health systems to expand antimicrobial stewardship initiatives to satellite locations.