Korea achieved its rapid economic development caTled " The Miracle o 「 Han − River " beginning in the l960 ' s ． This sudden economic develQpment caused rapid urbanization and accelerated growth in the urban popu 且 atiGn ． The Korean government supplied some housing in a short time to so 且 ve the problems from overcrewdi 囗 g ， but these supplied hQusing 且 et us know about the fixation Qf bouses for the high rise and high density apartment house cDmp 且 ex that characteri 乙 e Korean living culture ．風 ' hile at the same time new problems such as housing specutation and revDhing against development exist ． From this backgreund ， しhe authors defined the process of how high rise and high density apartment housing cDmplexes are connected to the housing polieies and ecDno 皿 ic bodies ． How to relate the consumer ' s interest a ［ so def正 ned ．

No abstract

No abstract

Standing on an assumption that development of house construction depends 』 upon the popular − ization ， it is important to define the process． From the point of view ， this paper picked up four factors ；quality control for materials and compQnents ， diffusion Qf new technique for professional and laymen ， structural design standards ， and condition oHabours ． The author got the conclusion fro 皿 this Iesearch ， as follows ； The Blitish Standard infiuenced the quality control ， because of it ' s long history ， never stopped at the war ・ period ． The populariza − tion of new technique developed with the state policy， supported by advisory co 皿 mittees ． The establishment of structural design related with engineers prefergnce ， in case of steel ， and tradi − tional system retarded progress， because of accustumed method ． The problem of labo 血rs was a key factor for notlonly traditional method ， but also i皿 novational ． Finaly ， it should be said that the contribution of the state acted very important role in this field ， KeyIVOtlts ：housing ， industrinlination ， quality ， paPularization

This thesis wiil fbcus on the Western analysis and criticism of contemporary Japanese architectu τ e ． Many Westem critics and architectural researchers have been trying to discover 山 e hidden Japanese concepts of space ． It is interesting fbr us ， in this thesis ， to analyze the apProach made to understand a culture (Japanese) from a diffbrent (Westem) perspective and state ofmind ． In order to do this ， a general view of the evolution of contemporary Japmese architecture， as conditions affecting Western critics ， wilI be made ． The 耳 we wm be able to analyze these critics and their own evol 面 on ． Most of the a且 icles treated with the contemporary Japanese architectUre at the time of their publication ． Although some of them treated traditional architecture ， a comparison was made to fbcus on the contemporary one ． Therefbre ， as we read about traditiona 且Japanese architecture ， it is in the intent of putting the contemporary architecture in perspective ． In this paper， by Japanese architecture we mean ' contemporary ， Japanese architectUre ． L2 − De 且 " o arc ite criticism Using both the senses and the intellec ち the critic analyzes and evalu 飢 es 山 e built enviro ent d i誌 e 飩 ct on 耐 nhabitants and users ． Criticism is different from commentary ． It is willing to judge and to condemn ． in a smal1 comparative stUdy ， we can make the two observations ： 1． The dominant trend in general interest over the last few years has not been towards criticism ． Instead ， it is oriented towards profiles and biographies ， where criticism may be an UnCOm 負)rtable intUSiOn ． ． 2． Over the last few years theoretical criticism ， as distinguished 丘om practical or applied criticism ， has been growing 、 ． in academic fields ， These observadons help us to define the state of criticism and commentaries on Japanese architecture written by Westem c 面 cs ． L3 −PrOcedure I． We have chosen three of the main architectural magazines 血 at are involved in architectural criticism ， and reviewed the articles conceming Japanese architecture ． The choice was made taking into consideration ： a − The geographica1 and cultUral differences in the West itself (Europe and the United States) ． Standards ， points of interest and approaches could be different between America and Europe． h general ， American critics stress on omament and image ， whethcr European critics stress on urbanism and participation ． Ih Europe itsel £ the French magazine reflects somehow the inland continent ' s point of view ， and the British magazine reflects the off 」 land， exp ］ oring Point ofview ． b− The popularity and distribution of the magazines themselves ． They are purchased in both academic and professional circles ， ゜ Graduate Student ， Kyushu Institute of Design ，