DNA replication is a highly demanding process regarding the energy and material supply and must be precisely regulated, involving multiple cellular feedbacks. The slowing down or stalling of DNA synthesis and/or replication forks is referred to as replication stress (RS). Owing to the complexity and requirements of replication, a plethora of factors may interfere and challenge the genome stability, cell survival or affect the whole organism. This review outlines chemical compounds that are known inducers of RS and commonly used in laboratory research. These compounds act on replication by direct interaction with DNA causing DNA crosslinks and bulky lesions (cisplatin), chemical interference with the metabolism of deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (hydroxyurea), direct inhibition of the activity of replicative DNA polymerases (aphidicolin) and interference with enzymes dealing with topological DNA stress (camptothecin, etoposide). As a variety of mechanisms can induce RS, the responses of mammalian cells also vary. Here, we review the activity and mechanism of action of these compounds based on recent knowledge, accompanied by examples of induced phenotypes, cellular readouts and commonly used doses.

Research on repurposing the old alcohol-aversion drug disulfiram (DSF) for cancer treatment has identified inhibition of NPL4, an adaptor of the p97/VCP segregase essential for turnover of proteins involved in multiple pathways, as an unsuspected cancer cell vulnerability. While we reported that NPL4 is targeted by the anticancer metabolite of DSF, the bis-diethyldithiocarbamate-copper complex (CuET), the exact, apparently multifaceted mechanism(s) through which the CuET-induced aggregation of NPL4 kills cancer cells remains to be fully elucidated. Given the pronounced sensitivity to CuET in tumor cell lines lacking the genome integrity caretaker proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2, here we investigated the impact of NPL4 targeting by CuET on DNA replication dynamics and DNA damage response pathways in human cancer cell models. Our results show that CuET treatment interferes with DNA replication, slows down replication fork progression and causes accumulation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Such a replication stress (RS) scenario is associated with DNA damage, preferentially in the S phase, and activates the homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair pathway. At the same time, we find that cellular responses to the CuET-triggered RS are seriously impaired due to concomitant malfunction of the ATRIP-ATR-CHK1 signaling pathway that reflects an unorthodox checkpoint silencing mode through ATR (Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related) kinase sequestration within the CuET-evoked NPL4 protein aggregates.

Chromatin DNA damage response (DDR) is orchestrated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase ring finger protein 168 (RNF168), resulting in ubiquitin-dependent recruitment of DDR factors and tumor suppressors breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1). This ubiquitin signaling regulates pathway choice for repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), toxic lesions whose frequency increases during tumorigenesis. Recruitment of 53BP1 curbs DNA end resection, thereby limiting homologous recombination (HR) and directing DSB repair toward error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Under cancer-associated ubiquitin starvation conditions reflecting endogenous or treatment-evoked proteotoxic stress, the ubiquitin-dependent accrual of 53BP1 and BRCA1 at the DNA damage sites is attenuated or lost. Challenging this current paradigm, here we identified diverse human cancer cell lines that display 53BP1 recruitment to DSB sites even under proteasome inhibitor-induced proteotoxic stress, that is, under substantial depletion of free ubiquitin. We show that central to this unexpected phenotype is overabundance of RNF168 that enables more efficient exploitation of the residual-free ubiquitin. Cells with elevated RNF168 are more resistant to combined treatment by ionizing radiation and proteasome inhibition, suggesting that such aberrant RNF168-mediated signaling might reflect adaptation to chronic proteotoxic and genotoxic stresses experienced by tumor cells. Moreover, the overabundant RNF168 and the ensuing unorthodox recruitment patterns of 53BP1, RIF1 and REV7 (monitored on laser micro-irradiation-induced DNA damage) shift the DSB repair balance from HR toward NHEJ, a scenario accompanied by enhanced chromosomal instability/micronuclei formation and sensitivity under replication stress-inducing treatments with camptothecin or poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor. Overall, our data suggest that the deregulated RNF168/53BP1 pathway could promote tumorigenesis by selecting for a more robust, better stress-adapted cancer cell phenotype, through altered DNA repair, fueling genomic instability and tumor heterogeneity. Apart from providing insights into cancer (patho)biology, the elevated RNF168, documented here also by immunohistochemistry on human clinical tumor specimens, may impact responses to standard-of-care and some emerging targeted cancer therapies.

No abstract