Background The bronchoscopy (BS) experience provokes anxiety amongst some patients. It can have a negative impact on the course of the procedure and on the willingness of patients to undergo the next BS in the future. Objective We aimed to identify factors influencing patients’ satisfaction with BS. Methods The prospective study had been conducted between January and June 2019. It included patients hospitalized in our Department, who underwent elective BS. Patients assessed their anxiety and satisfaction level before and after BS using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Data concerning the course of the bronchoscopy was collected. Results The median level of anxiety prior to the procedure was moderate, higher in women (p<0.0001). The majority of patients (116/125, 93%) were satisfied with appropriate information before the procedure. Almost one-third of the interviewees (39/125, 31%) declared complete satisfaction (VAS = 0) with their procedure, 17 patients (14%) were dissatisfied (VAS >5/10). Overall 113 (90%) patients declared unconditional consent for future bronchoscopy. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed two factors affecting patients’ satisfaction with bronchoscopy: anxiety prior to BS (standardized regression coefficient β = 0.264, p = 0.003) and discomfort (β = 0.205, p = 0.018). Neither age, degree of amnesia, duration of the procedure nor its type added any significant value as factors affecting patient satisfaction. The most common factors inducing patients’ discomfort during BS were local anesthesia of the throat (56/125, 45%) and cough (47/125, 38%). Conclusions Low anxiety level before bronchoscopy and reduced discomfort during the procedure are associated with better patient satisfaction. Thus, it is important to reduce patient anxiety and discomfort during the procedure.

No abstract

We present a case of a 50 year-old woman who was referred to our department with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and systemic mastocytosis. Conventional mechanical aortic valve replacement was performed successfully with the use of perioperative protocol based on dexamethasone, cetirizine and ranitidine. The only postoperative event was an onset of atrial fibrillation which was treated with amiodarone infusion. 8 days after surgery the patient was discharged home. JRCD 2017; 3 (2): 54-55

Purpose of Review The aim of this paper is to present basic data on pleural manometry and to outline the advances in its use as both a research tool enabling a better understanding of pleural pathophysiology and as a clinical tool useful in management strategy planning in patients with pleural diseases. To discuss updates and current trends in the development of pleural manometry, a search of the literature on pleural manometry published in recent years was performed. Recent Findings The technique of pleural manometry has significantly evolved over the last 40 years from simple water manometers to electronic or digital devices which enable the measurement and recording of instantaneous pleural pressure. Although to date it is mainly used as a research tool, pleural manometry has the potential to be applied in clinical practice. Recent studies demonstrated that monitoring of pleural pressure changes during therapeutic thoracentesis does not seem to be helpful in predicting re-expansion pulmonary edema and procedure-related chest discomfort. On the other hand, measurement of pleural elastance plays an important role in the diagnosis of unexpandable lung in patients with malignant pleural effusion facilitating determination of the optimal management strategy. Additionally, it allows for study of newly discovered phenomena, including pleural pressure pulse assessment and the impact of continuous positive airway pressure and cough on pleural pressure. Summary Pleural manometry is an established technique of pleural pressure measurement. Despite recent advances, its role in clinical practice remains undetermined.