Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Background: Significant achievements in the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) have provided effective therapeutic options for most patients. However, the true impact of the changed landscape of CTEPH therapies on patients’ management and outcomes is poorly known. We aimed to characterize the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of CTEPH patients in the modern era of CTEPH therapies. Methods: We analyzed the data of CTEPH adults enrolled in the prospective multicenter registry. Results: We enrolled 516 patients aged 63.8 ± 15.4 years. The incidence rate of CTEPH was 3.96 per million adults per year. The group was burdened with several comorbidities. New oral anticoagulants ( n = 301; 58.3%) were preferred over vitamin K antagonists ( n = 159; 30.8%). Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) was performed in 120 (23.3%) patients and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in 258 (50%) patients. PEA was pretreated with targeted pharmacotherapy in 19 (15.8%) patients, and BPA in 124 (48.1%) patients. Persistent CTEPH was present in 46% of PEA patients and in 65% of patients after completion of BPA. Persistent CTEPH after PEA was treated with targeted pharmacotherapy in 72% and with BPA in 27.7% of patients. At a mean time period of 14.3 ± 5.8 months, 26 patients had died. The use of PEA or BPA was associated with better survival than the use of solely medical treatment. Conclusions: The modern population of CTEPH patients comprises mostly elderly people significantly burdened with comorbid conditions. This calls for treatment decisions that are tailored individually for every patient. The combination of two or three methods is currently a frequent approach in the treatment of CTEPH. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03959748
IntroductIon There is an ongoing debate regarding aortic valve degenerative processes. Some markers of calcification and atherosclerosis may be potentially useful in establishing their etiology.objEctIvEs The aim of the study was to assess the bio chemical markers of calcification and atherosclerosis in patients with degenerative aortic stenosis (AS) in relation to the aortic valve calcium score (AVCS) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD).
PAtIEnts And mEthodsThe study involved 88 patients: 68 patients with degenerative AS (group A), including 44 patients with severe AS (A1; 25 patients with CAD) and 24 patients with moderate AS (A2; 13 patients with CAD) and 20 matched subjects as controls (18 patients with CAD). In all patients, clinical data were assessed, laboratory tests were done (including the analysis of serum inter leukin 4 [IL -4], osteoprotegerin [OPG], and fetuin -A levels), coronary angiography was performed, and the AVCS was measured.rEsuLts Study groups and subgroups had comparable serum IL -4, OPG, and fetuin -A levels. There were significant differences in the AVCS between patients with severe AS, moderate AS, and controls (3605 ±2542 Agatston units [AU], 1390 ±1143 AU, 100 ±194 AU, respectively; P <0.001). There were no significant correlations between the AVCS and serum IL -4, OPG, or fetuin -A levels. In moderate AS, serum OPG levels were higher in subjects with concomitant CAD (5.84 ±1.4 vs. 4.03 ±1.3 pmol/l, P = 0.036). In severe AS, the mean AVCS was similar in patients with and without CAD. Higher AVCS was observed only in patients with moderate AS and coexisting CAD compared with patients without CAD (1644 ±1285 vs. 902 ±789 AU, P = 0.038).concLusIons There were no significant differences between patients with and without degenerative AS in selected bio chemical markers. The presence of CAD in moderate AS was associated with increased AVCS and serum OPG levels suggesting the effect of atherosclerosis on early valve calcification. In patients with severe AS, there were no correlations between calcification and atherosclerotic markers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.