Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths. A short survival rate often results from belated diagnosis made in advanced stages. Therapy individualization requires the collection of a viable material for histopathological examination, which often brings difficulties. This study was performed in a group of 110 patients suspected of malignancy in chest computed tomography. All subjects underwent bronchofiberoscopy. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and endobronchial brushing were performed in all cases, whereas forceps tissue biopsy was taken if mucous membrane abnormalities were observed. In case of a negative result of bronchofiberoscopy invasive methods were implemented. A malignant neoplasm was diagnosed in 106 cases. Overall, cancer cells (positive result) were found in 45 patients (42.0%) subjected to bronchofiberoscopy. Cytology was positive in 38 (35.8%) and histopathological examination in 30 (28.3%) specimens. Eleven samples of BAL (10.3%) were positive. Endobronchial brushing was more effective, with 27 positive samples (25.5%). Forceps tissue biopsy was performed in 33 cases with 90% sensitivity. The most frequent cancer subtype found was squamous cell carcinoma. No severe complications of bronchofiberoscopy were observed. We conclude that bronchofiberosocpy is a safe diagnostic procedure for lung lesions, but its sensitivity and specificity are low. Only when there are mucous macroscopic changes observed, a precise diagnosis is possible.
Extracutaneous locations of primary malignant melanoma are rare. In the respiratory system most melanomas present as metastatic tumors. For the diagnosis of primary lung melanoma, strict histopathological and clinical criteria should be met. In this paper we present three cases of malignant melanoma which showed in the respiratory system. The first 2 case studies present primary lung melanomas, while the last one shows late lung metastasis of tumor originated from vaginal mucosa. The treatment of choice for localized disease as well as single metastasis is surgical excision.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.