No abstract

Human Gb3/CD77 synthase (α1,4-galactosyltransferase) is the only known glycosyltransferase that changes acceptor specificity because of a point mutation. The enzyme, encoded by A4GALT locus, is responsible for biosynthesis of Gal(α1–4)Gal moiety in Gb3 (CD77, Pk antigen) and P1 glycosphingolipids. We showed before that a single nucleotide substitution c.631C > G in the open reading frame of A4GALT, resulting in replacement of glutamine with glutamic acid at position 211 (substitution p. Q211E), broadens the enzyme acceptor specificity, so it can not only attach galactose to another galactose but also to N-acetylgalactosamine. The latter reaction leads to synthesis of NOR antigens, which are glycosphingolipids with terminal Gal(α1–4)GalNAc sequence, never before described in mammals. Because of the apparent importance of position 211 for enzyme activity, we stably transfected the 2102Ep cells with vectors encoding Gb3/CD77 synthase with glutamine substituted by aspartic acid or asparagine, and evaluated the cells by quantitative flow cytometry, high-performance thin-layer chromatography and real-time PCR. We found that cells transfected with vectors encoding Gb3/CD77 synthase with substitutions p. Q211D or p. Q211N did not express Pk, P1 and NOR antigens, suggesting complete loss of enzymatic activity. Thus, amino acid residue at position 211 of Gb3/CD77 synthase is critical for specificity and activity of the enzyme involved in formation of Pk, P1 and NOR antigens. Altogether, this approach affords a new insight into the mechanism of action of the human Gb3/CD77 synthase.

BRAF and cMET exon 14 skipping are rare mutations of NSCLC. The treatment sequence in these cases for the first and second line is not clear. An international registry was created for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring BRAF or cMET exon 14 skipping mutations, diagnosed from January 2017 to June 2022. Clinicopathological and molecular data and treatment patterns were recorded. Data on 58 patients, from eight centers across five countries, were included in the final analysis. We found that 40 patients had the cMET exon 14 skipping mutation and 18 had the BRAF V600E mutation. In total, 53 and 28 patients received first- and second-line treatments, respectively, among which 52.8% received targeted therapy (TT) in the first line and 53.5% in the second line. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for first-line treatment with TT vs. other treatment such as immune checkpoint inhibitors ± chemotherapy (IO ± CT) were 55.6% vs. 21.7% (p = 0.0084) and 66.7% vs. 39.1% (p = 0.04), respectively. The type of treatment in first-line TT vs. other affected time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) was 11.6 m vs. 4.6 m (p= 0.006). The overall survival for the whole group was 15.4 m and was not statistically affected by the type of treatment (19.2 m vs. 13.5 m; p = 0.83).