Background: We investigated the impact of a single unstructured educational lecture about vaccinations on the vaccine confidence in volunteer participants. Methods: We conducted a survey-based study during a series of open meetings related to pregnancy and parenting. Before and after the pediatrician’s lecture related to vaccinations, listeners completed the visual analogue scales (VAS, 0–15 cm), evaluating (1) self-declared knowledge on vaccinations and (2) how they perceive the safety and efficacy of this preventive method. Results: In total, 484 women aged 30 ± 4 years participated in the lecture (pregnant = 68%; ≥1 children = 56%). Participants declared to have more comprehensive knowledge on preventive vaccinations and perceived vaccines to be safer and more useful (the role for the immunity) after vs. before the lecture (median VAS: 10.4 vs. 7.2, 10.8 vs. 8.7, and 11.0 vs. 10.4 cm, all p < 0.001). Importantly, the prevalence of vaccine-related adverse events was also assessed as being higher after the lecture (median VAS: 9.9 vs. 8.0 cm, p < 0.001). The increase in self-declared knowledge on vaccinations and perceived need for vaccinations (delta VAS—VAS after minus before the lecture, expressed as % of baseline) was lower among participants who rated the lecture less vs. more useful. Importantly, both participants who liked vs. did not like the lecture comparably rated vaccines safer after vs. before the lecture (delta VAS (median, interquartile range): 16% (0–39%) vs. 18% (2–42%), p = 0.39). Conclusions: An educational lecture on vaccinations positively impacts vaccine confidence in young adult women. Irrespective of the subjective rating of the lecture, all listeners perceived vaccinations to be safer after vs. before the speech.
BACKGROUND. Pediatric patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at risk of developing severe influenza. Vaccination against influenza in HIV (+) children in Poland is recommended and free of charge. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in this group of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS. The study group consisted of 25 HIV-infected children, patients of the Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases in Wrocław, vaccinated against influenza from September to December 2016. The incidence of influenza and influenza-like diseases was monitored from December 1, 2016 to April 15, 2017. IgG / IgM against influenza A and B by ELISA and against AH1N1 by HI method before vaccination and 4-6 weeks after vaccination were determined. Nasopharyngeal swabs of influenza RNA for PCR testing were collected in each patient during each hospitalization in the epidemic season. RESULTS. In the 2016/2017 epidemic season, none of the patients developed symptomatic influenza or any other flu-like infection with fever. Influenza A virus RNA was detected in nasopharyngeal swabs in 8 patients, none of them presented any clinical symptoms of infection. Positive pre-vaccination IgG levels against influenza A and B were detected in 36% (9/25) and 68% (17/25) of patients, respectively. After vaccination, positive concentrations were found in 56% (14/25) and 80% (20/25) of patients, respectively. Positive concentration of IgM antibodies was achieved by 60% (15/25) of the respondents - for influenza A and 52% (13/25) - for influenza B. In 11 patients (45.8%) before vaccination, protective titres of antibodies against H1 haemagglutinin were obtained, after the vaccination the proportion of patients with a protective titer was 52.4%. CONCLUSIONS. Influenza vaccination in HIV-infected children is effective in preventing symptomatic influenza virus infection but does not prevent transmission of infection in the population. Annual influenza vaccination and seasonal natural infections with influenza viruses result in the persistence of measurable antibody levels until the next epidemic season.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.