BackgroundSurvival rates following a diagnosis of cancer vary between countries. The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP), a collaboration between six countries with primary care led health services, was set up in 2009 to investigate the causes of these differences. Module 3 of this collaboration hypothesised that an association exists between the readiness of primary care physicians (PCP) to investigate for cancer – the ‘threshold’ risk level at which they investigate or refer to a specialist for consideration of possible cancer – and survival for that cancer (lung, colorectal and ovarian). We describe the development of an international survey instrument to test this hypothesis.MethodsThe work was led by an academic steering group in England. They agreed that an online survey was the most pragmatic way of identifying differences between the jurisdictions. Research questions were identified through clinical experience and expert knowledge of the relevant literature.A survey comprising a set of direct questions and five clinical scenarios was developed to investigate the hypothesis. The survey content was discussed and refined concurrently and repeatedly with international partners. The survey was validated using an iterative process in England. Following validation the survey was adapted to be relevant to the health systems operating in other jurisdictions and translated into Danish, Norwegian and Swedish, and into Canadian and Australian English.ResultsThis work has produced a survey with face, content and cross cultural validity that will be circulated in all six countries. It could also form a benchmark for similar surveys in countries with similar health care systems.ConclusionsThe vignettes could also be used as educational resources. This study is likely to impact on healthcare policy and practice in participating countries.

No abstract

AimsTo understand the level of training given to staff in providers of accommodation in the London Borough of Hackney across mental and physical health.MethodThe Urgent and Emergency Care Collaborative (Health Education England) put out a call for funding bids around a number of workforce priority areas. This included upskilling care home staff to reduce admissions. We considered care home staff as those working across supported living schemes, housing with care, residential and nursing homes. Some of these settings exclusively support people with mental health needs.We obtained a list of accommodation providers across the borough via the Local Authority. As a Community Rehabilitation team we work closely with many of the providers. We also co-facilitate the Hackney Mental Health Supported Accommodation panel and review all funded placements annually. We made contact via email and phonecall and arranged face to face meetings with 11 providers. We asked a standard set of questions about the organisation and training provision. We also asked them to identify gaps in training.ResultThe level of training provided to staff varies vastly across different settings. There was a predominance of e-learning for some providers. Most staff in mental health settings are support worker level which limits the level of training offered/received.Providers varied greatly in size of project and management structure and this directly impacts on access to training, often as a result of cost.Providers were able to identify training gaps and were keen to have additional training.Some common themes emerged – dual diagnosis, psychosis, medication – and some setting specific themes – dementia.Based on the gaps identified we provided training sessions to a total of ~40 staff across a number of settings. Content included mental health awareness, crisis signposting and medicines management. All sessions were well received with pre and post-training questionnaires demonstrating an improvement in knowledge and confidence.ConclusionThere is potential for knowledge sharing across accommodation settings and for stronger links between accommodation providers and healthcare providers. We plan to explore the possibility of quantitative data on the number of Emergency Department presentations from accommodation settings locally.