Aim This study aimed to determine satisfaction with dietetic services, identify barriers and enablers to engaging with dietetic services and acceptable methods of delivering nutrition care to patients on haemodialysis. Methods A questionnaire was developed based on existing satisfaction surveys and key constructs from the Theoretical Domains Framework to understand patient behaviours around accessing dietetic services. Constructs were grouped according to the COM‐B model (Capability, Opportunity and Motivation) of the Behaviour Change Wheel to inform future interventions. Patients at three Brisbane haemodialysis units participated, with questionnaire administered via laptop (by dietetic assistants) or paper‐based version (by nurses). Results Sixty‐six patients completed the questionnaire (response rate 40%, 62 ± 14 years, 58% male). Most respondents (n = 63, 95%) reported seeing a dietitian since commencing haemodialysis. A quarter of respondents reported declining or not wanting to see the dietitian. Despite this, questions pertaining to service satisfaction were largely positive. Questions related to enablers and barriers to engaging with the dietitian revealed the domain of motivation as the main barrier with 41% (n = 26) participants not wanting to make dietary changes. The domains of capability and opportunity were not barriers. Patients preferred receiving nutrition information from dietitians, when they had a question or concern, rather than at predefined intervals. Telehealth was not acceptable to the majority of participants. Conclusions While patients were satisfied with dietetic care, their preferences for dietetic service delivery were not aligned with current evidence‐based guidelines, highlighting need for alternative models of care. Dietetic interventions need to be delivered in a way that addresses motivation.

Background: Restricting dietary sodium consumption has been considered a major component of self-care management in heart failure (HF); however, the evidence supporting this recommendation has not been conclusive. The Study of Dietary Intervention Under 100 MMOL in Heart Failure (SODIUM-HF) trial aims to assess the effects of dietary sodium reduction on clinical outcomes in a HF population using a pragmatic design to provide empirical evidence to guide dietary sodium intake recommendations in patients with chronic HF. Methods: SODIUM-HF is a multicentre, open-label, blinded adjudicated endpoint, randomized controlled trial in ambulatory patients with chronic HF. This trial involves participants recruited from sites in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Colombia, and Chile, who are CJC Open 2 (2020) 8e14

No abstract

Background Treatment of medically compromised patients with eating disorders is difficult in general hospital wards. There is currently no consensus on the best feeding method; however, previous research has demonstrated the safety of using enteral feeding. Because an oral diet has benefits on psychological and behavioural pathways, concurrent feeding requires further investigation. The present study aimed to examine acceptability and safety of implementing mini meals to a previously nil‐by‐mouth 7‐day enteral feeding protocol. Methods This was mixed methods research including a retrospective observational study and participant survey. Patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia, between July 2020 and March 2021 were eligible. Eligible participants were provided mini meals from day 5. Type and quantity of meals consumed alongside clinical incident data were collected. The survey examined acceptability of mini meals. Descriptive statistics were used to interpret findings. Content analyses were conducted on survey responses. Results Sixty‐four participants (95%, n = 57/60 female, 25.2 ± 8.9 years; 75%, n = 45/60 diagnosed with anorexia nervosa) were included. At least half of the participants consumed some or all of the mini meals at each meal period. No clinical incidents were reported. Twenty‐six (50%, n = 26/52) surveys were returned. Half (54%, n = 14/26) agreed‐strongly agreed that mini meals improved their experience. Eleven participants desired more choice in menu items. Conclusions The present study found that introducing mini meals into an enteral feeding protocol is acceptable and safe for patients with eating disorders. Participants reported benefits in returning to eating; however, some items on the menu require reconsideration to enable increased consumption.

No abstract