Following on from ideas developed by Gerstmann, a body of work has suggested that impairments in finger gnosis may be causally related to children's difficulties in learning arithmetic. We report a study with a large sample of typically developing children (N=197) in which we assessed finger gnosis and arithmetic along with a range of other relevant cognitive predictors of arithmetic skills (vocabulary, counting, and symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude judgments). Contrary to some earlier claims, we found no meaningful association between finger gnosis and arithmetic skills. Counting and symbolic magnitude comparison were, however, powerful predictors of arithmetic skills, replicating a number of earlier findings. Our findings seriously question theories that posit either a simple association or a causal connection between finger gnosis and the development of arithmetic skills.
Pattern understanding (patterning) is commonly taught in early years classrooms. However, the relationship between patterning and academic attainment is not well understood. Studies investigating children's pattern understanding are reviewed. There is some evidence to suggest that pattern understanding is causally related to acquiring math and reading skills. However, much of the evidence is weak and these conclusions remain tentative. Future studies of the relationship between patterning and other skills need to use psychometrically robust measures and analytic techniques that control for the effects of measurement error. The suggestion from current studies that training patterning skills in young children can improve math and reading attainments is tantalizing but larger, methodologically more robust, Randomized Controlled Trials are badly needed to confirm such claims.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.