Fetal phonocardiography (fPCG) is a non-invasive technique for detection of fetal heart sounds (fHSs), murmurs and vibrations. This acoustic recording is passive and provides an alternative lowcost method to ultrasonographic cardiotocography (CTG). Unfortunately, the fPCG signal is often disturbed by the wide range of artifacts that make it difficult to obtain significant diagnostic information from this signal. The study focuses on the filtering of an fPCG signal containing three types of noise (ambient noise, Gaussian noise, and movement artifacts of the mother and the fetus) having different amplitudes. Three advanced signal processing methods: empirical mode decomposition (EMD), ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), and adaptive wavelet transform (AWT) were tested and compared. The evaluation of the extraction was performed by determining the accuracy of S1 sounds detection and by determining the fetal heart rate (fHR). The evaluation of the effectiveness of the method was performed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), mean error of heart interval measurement (|∆T i |), and the statistical parameters of accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), positive predictive value (PPV), and harmonic mean between SE and PPV (F1). Using the EMD method, ACC > 95% was achieved in 7 out of 12 types and levels of interference with average values of ACC = 88.73%, SE = 91.57%, PPV = 94.80% and F1 = 93.12%. Using the EEMD method, ACC > 95% was achieved in 9 out of 12 types and levels of interference with average values of ACC = 97.49%, SE = 97.89%, PPV = 99.53% and F1 = 98.69%. In this study, the best results were achieved using the AWT method, which provided ACC > 95% in all 12 types and levels of interference with average values of ACC = 99.34%, SE = 99.49%, PPV = 99.85% a F1 = 99.67%. INDEX TERMSFetal phonocardiography (fPCG), fetal heart rate (fHR), non-invasive fetal monitoring, empirical mode decomposition (EMD), ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), adaptive wavelet transform (AWT).
This study focuses on fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) processing using hybrid methods that combine two or more individual methods. Combinations of independent component analysis (ICA), wavelet transform (WT), recursive least squares (RLS), and empirical mode decomposition (EMD) were used to create the individual hybrid methods. Following four hybrid methods were compared and evaluated in this study: ICA-EMD, ICA-EMD-WT, EMD-WT, and ICA-RLS-EMD. The methods were tested on two databases, the ADFECGDB database and the PhysioNet Challenge 2013 database. Extraction evaluation is based on fetal heart rate (fHR) determination. Statistical evaluation is based on determination of correct detection (ACC), sensitivity (Se), positive predictive value (PPV), and harmonic mean between Se and PPV (F1). In this study, the best results were achieved by means of the ICA-RLS-EMD hybrid method, which achieved accuracy (ACC) > 80% at 9 out of 12 recordings when tested on the ADFECGDB database, reaching an average value of ACC > 84%, Se > 87%, PPV > 92%, and F1 > 90%. When tested on the Physionet Challenge 2013 database, ACC > 80% was achieved at 12 out of 25 recordings with an average value of ACC > 64%, Se > 69%, PPV > 79%, and F1 > 72%.INDEX TERMS Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography, fetal heart rate, hybrid methods, empirical mode decomposition (EMD), independent component analysis (ICA), wavelet transform (WT), recursive least squares (RLS).
Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography appears to be one of the most promising fetal monitoring techniques during pregnancy and delivery nowadays. This method is based on recording electrical potentials produced by the fetal heart from the surface of the maternal abdomen. Unfortunately, in addition to the useful fetal electrocardiographic signal, there are other interference signals in the abdominal recording that need to be filtered. The biggest challenge in designing filtration methods is the suppression of the maternal electrocardiographic signal. This study focuses on the extraction of fetal electrocardiographic signal from abdominal recordings using a combination of independent component analysis, recursive least squares, and ensemble empirical mode decomposition. The method was tested on two databases, the Fetal Electrocardiograms, Direct and Abdominal with Reference Heartbeats Annotations and the PhysioNet Challenge 2013 database. The evaluation was performed by the assessment of the accuracy of fetal QRS complexes detection and the quality of fetal heart rate determination. The effectiveness of the method was measured by means of the statistical parameters as accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F1-score. Using the proposed method, when testing on the Fetal Electrocardiograms, Direct and Abdominal with Reference Heartbeats Annotations database, accuracy higher than 80% was achieved for 11 out of 12 recordings with an average value of accuracy 92.75% [95% confidence interval: 91.19–93.88%], sensitivity 95.09% [95% confidence interval: 93.68–96.03%], positive predictive value 96.36% [95% confidence interval: 95.05–97.17%] and F1-score 95.69% [95% confidence interval: 94.83–96.35%]. When testing on the Physionet Challenge 2013 database, accuracy higher than 80% was achieved for 17 out of 25 recordings with an average value of accuracy 78.24% [95% confidence interval: 73.44–81.85%], sensitivity 81.79% [95% confidence interval: 76.59–85.43%], positive predictive value 87.16% [95% confidence interval: 81.95–90.35%] and F1-score 84.08% [95% confidence interval: 80.75–86.64%]. Moreover, the non-invasive ST segment analysis was carried out on the records from the Fetal Electrocardiograms, Direct and Abdominal with Reference Heartbeats Annotations database and achieved high accuracy in 7 from in total of 12 records (mean values μ < 0.1 and values of ±1.96σ < 0.1).
This study focuses on non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram extraction based on a novel hybrid method, which combines the advantages of non-adaptive and adaptive approaches for non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram morphological analysis. Besides estimating fetal heart rate, which is the main parameter used in the clinical practice, this study provides non-invasive ST segment analysis on data from Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database consisting of simultaneous traditionalgold standard invasive fetal scalp electrode and non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram recorded during delivery. This innovative approach utilizing the combination of independent component analysis and recursive least squares algorithms has the potential to extract valuable information from non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram in order to identify eventual sign of fetal distress. This was a prospective observational study of non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram, using 4 abdominally sited electrodes, against the traditional fetal scalp electrode on 8 patients. In terms of fetal heart rate estimation, the accuracy was high for all 8 tested patients with average value equaled 0.20 beats per minute and average value of 1.96 standard deviation equaled 5.80 beats per minute. In 7 patients, it was possible to perform the ST segment analysis with high accuracy in determining T/QRS in comparison with the reference fetal scalp electrode signal with average values and 1.96 standard deviation equaled 0.008 and 0.031 respectively. This study thus demonstrates that ST segment analysis is feasible using non-invasive fECG using the proposed hybrid method. INDEX TERMS Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography (NI-fECG), fetal heart rate (fHR), ST segment analysis (ST-analysis), hybrid method (HM), independent component analysis and recursive least squares (ICA-RLS), electronic fetal monitoring (EFM), fetal distress (FD), fetal scalp electrode (FSE).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.