No abstract

Introduction. Strategic directions of Ukraine’s development require improvement of the process of formation and implementation of the state’s foreign policy, the delineation of priority vectors of cooperation with international ?nancial partners, including IFIs. Problem Statement. The need to take into account the challenges and threats that arise in the current realities of the application of programs to support the formation and development of a platform for cooperation with international ?nancial institutions (IFIs) / partners in the martial law in Ukraine. Purpose. To study the state of attraction and use of loans (credits) of IFIs and international partners during the martial law in Ukraine, in particular to identify key areas, objectives, expected results of attracting international ?nancial assistance and prospects for further cooperation in accordance with state policy documents. Methods. General and special methods are used: analysis, synthesis, grouping, description, comparison, theoretical generalization and abstract-logical. Results. The programs of emergency ?nancial support of Ukraine by international ?nancial institutions and other partners in the conditions of martial law are analyzed. Preliminary estimates of the economic losses that Ukraine has already su?ered as a result of the Russian military invasion are analyzed. An analysis of projects and promising areas of development and implementation of postwar reconstruction programs in the framework of international ?nancial cooperation. Conclusions. The need for appropriate legislative regulation to ensure effective, targeted and controlled use of emergency financial resources of international partners involved under new and improved mechanisms is substantiated. It is extremely important to improve or develop regulations in the ?eld of ensuring e?ective international ?nancial cooperation of Ukraine: adoption of a new medium-term Strategy of cooperation with IFIs; formation of scienti?c and methodological approach to assessing ?nancial security of Ukraine in the context of attracting credit and ?nancial resources of IFIs; adoption of a new Partnership Strategy of Ukraine and the World Bank for 2022-2026.

No abstract

No abstract

The article emphasizes that the creation of a state system of critical infrastructure protection requires legal regulation of the basic principles of its operation, the introduction of common approaches to the management of system facilities at the state and local levels, defining the principles of interaction between state bodies and society. and citizens. Specific problematic aspects of the sphere of critical infrastructure protection in the process of reform are considered, among which: lack of a unified national system of critical infrastructure protection; insufficiency and inconsistency of normative-legal regulation on protection of systems and objects of critical infrastructure; lack of a state body responsible for coordinating actions in the field of critical infrastructure protection, uncertainty of powers, tasks and responsibilities of central executive bodies and other state bodies in the field of critical infrastructure protection, as well as rights, duties and responsibilities of owners (managers) critical infrastructure; underdeveloped public-private partnership in the field of critical infrastructure protection and uncertainty of sources of funding for critical infrastructure protection measures, insufficient level of international cooperation in the field of critical infrastructure protection. Some issues of strengthening the protection of critical infrastructure in the context of cooperation with IFI`s have been studied. The authors consider the financing of infrastructure development projects implemented in Ukraine through borrowings raised by Ukraine from international partners, including the EBRD, the World Bank, KfW and others. The need to adopt the draft Law of Ukraine “On Critical Infrastructure” № 5219 was emphasized. To support the critical infrastructure protection management system, it is proposed to adopt a Critical Infrastructure Protection Management Strategy for the medium term until 2025, which will form the basis for sustainable and inclusive development of the critical infrastructure protection system and the national economy in general.