Aims The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of oesophageal lesions after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) with or without the use of oesophageal temperature probes. Methods and results Two hundred patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: the OPERA+ group underwent RFA using oesophageal probes (SensiTherm™); the OPERA− group received RFA using fixed energy levels of 25 W at the posterior wall without an oesophageal probe. All patients underwent post-interventional endoscopy and Holter-electrocardiogram after 6 months. (Clinical.Trials.gov: NCT03246594). One hundred patients were randomized in OPERA+ and 100 patients in OPERA−. The drop-out rate was 10%. In total, 18/180 (10%) patients developed endoscopically diagnosed oesophageal lesions (EDEL). There was no difference between the groups with 10/90 (11%) EDEL in OPERA+ vs. 8/90 (9%) in OPERA− (P = 0.62). Despite the higher power delivered at the posterior wall in OPERA+ [28 ± 4 vs. 25 ± 2 W (P = 0.001)], the average EDEL size was equal [5.7 ± 2.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.7 mm (P = 0.38)]. The peak temperature did not correlate with EDEL size. During follow-up, no patient died. Only one patient in OPERA− required a specific therapy for treatment of the lesion. Cumulative AF recurrence after 6 (3–13) months was 28/87 (32%) vs. 34/88 (39%), P = 0.541. Conclusion This first randomized study demonstrates that intraoesophageal temperature monitoring using the SensiTherm™ probe does not affect the probability of developing EDEL. The peak temperature measured by the thermoprobe seems not to correlate with the incidence of EDEL. Empiric energy reduction at the posterior wall did not affect the efficacy of the procedure.

This study demonstrates significantly better outcomes in terms of restenosis after stent implantation versus PTA only, with comparable complication rates for these 2 options of interventional treatment of radiofrequency-induced PVS. In summary, despite the lack of randomized studies, the present data and currently available published studies seem to favor stent implantation as a first-line therapy in patients with radiofrequency-induced severe PVS.

No abstract

Background— The effects of time to referral for catheter ablation (CA) of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) on acute success, VT recurrence, and cardiac mortality are unclear. Methods and Results— We investigated 300 patients after CA of sustained VT. CA was performed within 30 days after the first documented VT in 75 (25%) patients (group 1), between 1 month and 1 year in 84 (28%) patients (group 2), and >1 year after the first VT occurrence in 141 (47%) patients (group 3). The end points were noninducibility of any VT after CA (acute success), VT recurrence and cardiac mortality after 2 years. Acute success was achieved in 66 (88%) patients in group 1, 68 (81%) in group 2, and in 99 (70.2%) in group 3 ( P =0.008). During the 2-year follow-up period, VT recurred in 28 (37.3%) patients in group 1, 52 (61.9%) patients in group 2, and 91 (64.5%) patients in group 3 ( P <0.0001). Recurrence-free survival was higher in group 1, as compared with group 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; P =0.009) and group 3 (HR, 2.04; P =0.001). No survival difference was observed between groups 1 and 2 (HR, 0.85; P =0.68) and groups 1 and 3 (HR, 1.13; P =0.73). β-blocker therapy, VT of ischemic origin, and complete success were associated with VT-free survival. VT recurrence (HR, 1.91; P =0.037) predicted cardiac mortality. Conclusions— CA of scar-related VT performed within 30 days after the first documented VT was associated with improved acute and long-term success. VT recurrence, but not the early referral for CA, was associated with cardiovascular mortality.

Even in the era of wide circumferential lesions, PVS still occurs. While surgical PV patch plasty represents a valuable treatment option, restenosis remains an issue during follow-up. Nevertheless, surgical repair achieves highly acceptable long-term results for RFA-acquired PVS. Hence, it should be routinely discussed as a therapeutic option in cases with multiple PVS.