Background Delirium is acute brain dysfunction associated with serious illness. Emerging data indicate that delirium occurs in greater than 20% of children in pediatric intensive care units. Cardiac bypass surgery is a known risk factor for delirium in adults, but has never been systematically studied in pediatrics. Objectives To describe the incidence of delirium in pediatric patients after cardiac bypass surgery, and explore associated risk factors and effect of delirium on in-hospital outcomes. Design Prospective observational single-center study. Setting Fourteen-bed pediatric cardiothoracic intensive care unit (PCICU). Patients One hundred and ninety four consecutive admissions following cardiac bypass surgery, age one day to 21 years. Interventions Subjects were screened for delirium daily using the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium. Measurements and Main Results Incidence of delirium in this sample was 49%. Delirium most often lasted 1–2 days, and developed within the first 1–3 days after surgery. Age less than two years, developmental delay, higher RACHS-1 score, cyanotic disease, and albumin less than three were all independently associated with development of delirium in a multivariable model (all p values <0.03). Delirium was an independent predictor of prolonged ICU LOS, with patients who were ever delirious having a 60% increase in ICU days compared to patients who were never delirious (p<0.01). Conclusions In our institution, delirium is a frequent problem in children after cardiac bypass surgery, with identifiable risk factors. Our study suggests that cardiac bypass surgery significantly increases children’s susceptibility to delirium. This highlights the need for heightened, targeted delirium screening in all PCICUs to potentially improve outcomes in this vulnerable patient population.

Objectives: Assessing outcomes after pediatric critical illness is imperative to evaluate practice and improve recovery of patients and their families. We conducted a scoping review of the literature to identify domains and instruments previously used to evaluate these outcomes. Design: Scoping review. Setting: We queried PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Registry for studies evaluating pediatric critical care survivors or their families published between 1970 and 2017. We identified articles using key words related to pediatric critical illness and outcome domains. We excluded articles if the majority of patients were greater than 18 years old or less than 1 month old, mortality was the sole outcome, or only instrument psychometrics or procedural outcomes were reported. We used dual review for article selection and data extraction and categorized outcomes by domain (overall health, emotional, physical, cognitive, health-related quality of life, social, family). Subjects: Manuscripts evaluating outcomes after pediatric critical illness. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Of 60,349 citations, 407 articles met inclusion criteria; 87% were published after 2000. Study designs included observational (85%), interventional (7%), qualitative (5%), and mixed methods (3%). Populations most frequently evaluated were traumatic brain injury (n = 96), general pediatric critical illness (n = 87), and congenital heart disease (n = 72). Family members were evaluated in 74 studies (18%). Studies used a median of 2 instruments (interquartile range 1–4 instruments) and evaluated a median of 2 domains (interquartile range 2–3 domains). Social (n = 223), cognitive (n = 183), and overall health (n = 161) domains were most frequently studied. Across studies, 366 unique instruments were used, most frequently the Wechsler and Glasgow Outcome Scales. Individual domains were evaluated using a median of 77 instruments (interquartile range 39–87 instruments). Conclusions: A comprehensive, generalizable understanding of outcomes after pediatric critical illness is limited by heterogeneity in methodology, populations, domains, and instruments. Developing assessment standards may improve understanding of postdischarge outcomes and support development of interventions after pediatric critical illness.

The first PCC orientation training integrated with simulation was effective and logistically feasible. The train to success concept with repetitive practice was highly valued by participants. Continuation and expansion of this novel multi-institutional training is planned.