This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

No abstract

Background: Systemic anticoagulation after pediatric liver transplantation (pLT) is believed to reduce the incidence of vascular thrombosis, but it may also cause an increase in hemorrhagic complications. Procedure:A 5-year retrospective review of pLT done at our institution was performed (2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018). The occurrence of early hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications was compared when using low-dose or high-dose anticoagulation after transplant (p < .05 considered significant).Results: Sixty-nine patients received 73 transplants during the study period. Median age at transplant was 2.3 years (40 days to 18.5 years). Low-dose anticoagulation was utilized in 71% cases. Additionally, six patients were converted from low-dose to high-dose anticoagulation because of a thrombotic event or concerns for suboptimal vascular inflow. Postoperative anticoagulation was discontinued in 18 occurrences due to bleeding (low dose 19%, high dose 47% vs. low dose to high dose 17%, p = .085). Surgical take back for bleeding occurred in 17 occasions (low dose 13.5%, high dose 53% vs. low dose to high dose 33%, p = .005). The overall incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and portal vein thrombosis were each 5.5%, respectively. While patient survival was not statistically different between groups, graft survival was significantly lower in the high-dose group (low dose 93%, high dose 73% vs. low dose to high dose 100%, p = .046). However, graft losses from HAT were similar between groups (low dose 2%, high dose 7% vs. low dose to high dose 0%, p = .56). Conclusion:The use of a standardized risk-adjusted anticoagulation protocol after pLT is associated with a low occurrence of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications.High-dose anticoagulation leads to more bleeding, but those risks outweigh the risks of possible graft loss.

Introduction: Primary liver transplants (pLT) in patients with biliary atresia (BA) are infrequent, since most babies with BA undergo a prior Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE). This study compared transplant outcomes in children with BA with or without a prior KPE. We hypothesized that pLT have less morbidity and better outcomes compared to those done after a failed KPE. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with BA transplanted at our institution was performed. Patients were included if they received a pLT or if they were transplanted less than 2 years from KPE. Outcomes were compared between those groups. Comparisons were also made based on era (early: 1997–2008 vs. modern: 2009–2020). p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Patients who received a pLT were older at diagnosis (141.5 ± 46.0 vs. KPE 67.1 ± 25.5 days, p < 0.001). The time between diagnosis and listing for transplant was shorter in the pLT group (44.5 ± 44.7 vs. KPE 140.8 ± 102.8 days, p < 0.001). In the modern era, the calculated PELD score for the pLT was significantly higher (23 ± 8 vs. KPE 16 ± 8, p = 0.022). Two waitlist deaths occurred in the KPE group (none in pLT, p = 0.14). Both the duration of transplant surgery and transfusion requirements were similar in both groups. There was a significant improvement in graft survival in transplants after KPE between eras (early era 84.3% vs. modern era 97.8%, p = 0.025). The 1-year patient and graft survival after pLT was 100%. Conclusions: Patient and graft survival after pLT are comparable to transplants after a failed KPE but pLT avoids a prior intervention. There was no significant difference in pre- or peri-transplant morbidity between groups other than wait list mortality. A multicenter collaboration with more patients may help demonstrate the potential benefits of pLT in patients predicted to have early failure of KPE.