Expanded carrier screening identifies individuals who are at risk of having a child with an autosomal recessive condition. The most accurate risk assessment requires that both mother and father undergo carrier screening to determine whether they are carriers of the same autosomal recessive condition. A couple identified as carriers of the same condition has a 25% chance of having a child with that condition. However, the father does not always opt for carrier screening following a positive result in the mother. This study aimed to identify barriers that prevent the father from carrier screening after a positive finding in the mother. A total of 58 women participated in this study. All participants had undergone expanded carrier screening prior to the study and had met with a genetic counselor for a pre‐test, informed consent session. Of the 58 women, 34 had partners who did not undergo screening and 24 had partners who did. Participants completed a survey to determine the barriers that prevented the father of the baby's participation. We report that the mother's insurance type, whether the father has insurance, relationship status, and knowledge of the carrier screen showed statistically significant differences between women whose partners underwent screening and those that did not. In summary, our finding suggests that increasing insurance coverage of paternal screening and improving the patient's knowledge of the expanded screen would encourage paternal screening.

No abstract

Telegenetics is the use of telemedicine to deliver clinical genetic services to patients. During the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE), telegenetics was essential for the Center of Personalized Genetic Healthcare (CPGH). This study reviews and analyzes in the context of the RE-AIM framework CPGH’s rapid implementation of telegenetics and its impact. We conducted a chart review of all out-patient telegenetics encounters scheduled in CPGH during the first five weeks of the COVID-19 PHE. Data analyzed included demographics; number of encounters scheduled; subspecialties and providers; outcome of encounter (completed, cancelled, no- show); and telehealth platform used. Data were compared to data for out-patient encounters in 2019. In the first five weeks of the COVID-19 PHE, 465 virtual visits were scheduled and 428 were completed, involving all six subspecialties and 86% of CPGH providers. The no-show plus cancellation rate was significantly lower than in 2019. By week four, CPGH’s virtual visit volume was 82% of its out-patient volume during the same time period in 2019. Patients over 60 and Black patients were significantly more likely to use phone-audio only appointments. CPGH rapidly implemented telegenetic services to continue providing care to patients. We identified success factors that enabled this. However, our analysis also identified a possible “digital divide” for Black and older patients.