Noncoding regulatory microRNAs (miRNAs) of cellular and viral origin control gene expression by repressing the translation of mRNAs into protein. Interestingly, miRNAs are secreted actively through small vesicles called "exosomes" that protect them from degradation by RNases, suggesting that these miRNAs may function outside the cell in which they were produced. Here we demonstrate that miRNAs secreted by EBV-infected cells are transferred to and act in uninfected recipient cells. Using a quantitative RT-PCR approach, we demonstrate that mature EBV-encoded miRNAs are secreted by EBV-infected B cells through exosomes. These EBV-miRNAs are functional because internalization of exosomes by MoDC results in a dose-dependent, miRNAmediated repression of confirmed EBV target genes, including CXCL11/ ITAC, an immunoregulatory gene down-regulated in primary EBVassociated lymphomas. We demonstrate that throughout coculture of EBV-infected B cells EBV-miRNAs accumulate in noninfected neighboring MoDC and show that this accumulation is mediated by transfer of exosomes. Thus, the exogenous EBV-miRNAs transferred through exosomes are delivered to subcellular sites of gene repression in recipient cells. Finally, we show in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with increased EBV load that, although EBV DNA is restricted to the circulating B-cell population, EBV BART miRNAs are present in both B-cell and non-B-cell fractions, suggestive of miRNA transfer. Taken together our findings are consistent with miRNA-mediated gene silencing as a potential mechanism of intercellular communication between cells of the immune system that may be exploited by the persistent human γ-herpesvirus EBV.

Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) establishes a long-term latent infection and is associated with a number of human malignancies that are thought to arise from deregulation of different stages of the viral life cycle. Recently, a large number of microRNAs (miRNAs) have been described for EBV, and it has been suggested that their expression may vary between the different latency states found in normal and malignant tissue. To date, however, no technique has been utilized to comprehensively and quantitatively test this idea by profiling expression of the EBV miRNAs in primary infected tissues. We describe here a multiplex reverse transcription-PCR assay that allows the profiling of 39 of the 40 known mature EBV miRNAs from as little as 250 ng of RNA. With this approach, we present a comprehensive profile of EBV miRNAs in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) tumors including estimates of miRNA copy number per tumor cell. This is the first comprehensive profiling of EBV miRNAs in any EBVassociated tumor. In contrast to previous suggestions, we show that the BART-derived miRNAs are present in a wide range of copy numbers from <10 3 per cell in both primary tumors and the widely used NPC-derived C666-1 cell line. However, we confirm the hypothesis that the BHRF1 miRNAs are not expressed in NPC. Lastly, we demonstrate that EBV miRNA expression in the widely used NPC line C666-1 is, with some caveats, broadly representative of primary NPC tumors.

We have performed the first extensive profiling of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) miRNAs on in vivo derived normal and neoplastic infected tissues. We describe a unique pattern of viral miRNA expression by normal infected cells in vivo expressing restricted viral latency programs (germinal center: Latency II and memory B: Latency I/0). This includes the complete absence of 15 of the 34 miRNAs profiled. These consist of 12 BART miRNAs (including approximately half of Cluster 2) and 3 of the 4 BHRF1 miRNAs. All but 2 of these absent miRNAs become expressed during EBV driven growth (Latency III). Furthermore, EBV driven growth is accompanied by a 5–10 fold down regulation in the level of the BART miRNAs expressed in germinal center and memory B cells. Therefore, Latency III also expresses a unique pattern of viral miRNAs. We refer to the miRNAs that are specifically expressed in EBV driven growth as the Latency III associated miRNAs. In EBV associated tumors that employ Latency I or II (Burkitt's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and gastric carcinoma), the Latency III associated BART but not BHRF1 miRNAs are up regulated. Thus BART miRNA expression is deregulated in the EBV associated tumors. This is the first demonstration that Latency III specific genes (the Latency III associated BARTs) can be expressed in these tumors. The EBV associated tumors demonstrate very similar patterns of miRNA expression yet were readily distinguished when the expression data were analyzed either by heat-map/clustering or principal component analysis. Systematic analysis revealed that the information distinguishing the tumor types was redundant and distributed across all the miRNAs. This resembles “secret sharing” algorithms where information can be distributed among a large number of recipients in such a way that any combination of a small number of recipients is able to understand the message. Biologically, this may be a consequence of functional redundancy between the miRNAs.

MLN4924 is an investigational small-molecule inhibitor of the NEDD8-activating enzyme (NAE) in phase I clinical trials. NAE inhibition prevents the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of substrates for cullin-RING ubiquitin E3 ligases that support cancer pathophysiology, but the genetic determinants conferring sensitivity to NAE inhibition are unknown. To address this gap in knowledge, we conducted a genome-wide siRNA screen to identify genes and pathways that affect the lethality of MLN4924 in melanoma cells. Of the 154 genes identified, approximately one-half interfered with components of the cell cycle, apoptotic machinery, ubiquitin system, and DNA damage response pathways. In particular, genes involved in DNA replication, p53, BRCA1/BRCA2, transcription-coupled repair, and base excision repair seemed to be important for MLN4924 lethality. In contrast, genes within the G 2 -M checkpoint affected sensitivity to MLN4924 in colon cancer cells. Cell-cycle analysis in melanoma cells by flow cytometry following RNAi-mediated silencing showed that MLN4924 prevented the transition of cells from S-G 2 phase after induction of rereplication stress. Our analysis suggested an important role for the p21-dependent intra-S-phase checkpoint and extensive rereplication, whereas the ATR-dependent intra-S-phase checkpoint seemed to play a less dominant role. Unexpectedly, induction of the p21-dependent intra-S-phase checkpoint seemed to be independent of both Cdt1 stabilization and ATR signaling. Collectively, these data enhance our understanding of the mechanisms by which inhibition of NEDD8-dependent ubiquitination causes cell death, informing clinical development of MLN4924. Cancer Res; 73(1); 225-34. Ó2012 AACR.

Background Tazemetostat (EPZ-6438) is a selective inhibitor of the histone methyltransferase EZH2, currently in clinical development for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and genetically defined tumors. Procedures Tazemetostat was tested against the PPTP solid tumor xenografts using a dose of 400 mg/kg administered twice-daily by oral gavage for 28 days. H3K27me3:H3 ratios were determined in control and treated tumors. Results Tazemetostat induced significant differences in event free survival (EFS) distribution compared to control in 9 of 30 (30%) of the xenografts studied. Significant differences in EFS distribution were observed in 5 of 7 (71%) rhabdoid tumor xenograft lines compared to 4 of 23 (17%) non-rhabdoid xenograft lines [chi square (χ2) test p=0.006]. Tazemetostat induced tumor growth inhibition meeting criteria for intermediate and high EFS treated to control (T/C) activity in 2 of 25 (8%) and 1 of 25 (4%) xenografts, respectively. Intermediate and high activity for the EFS T/C metric was observed exclusively among rhabdoid tumor xenografts (3 of 5 rhabdoid tumor versus 0 of 22 non-rhabdoid tumors (χ2 test p<0.001). One rhabdoid tumor xenograft (G401) showed stable disease. For one rhabdoid tumor (G401), delayed tumor regression to tazemetostat was noted following 1 week of tumor growth. Tazemetostat induced significant reduction of H3K27me3 levels in the majority of tumors compared to controls. Conclusions Tazemetostat demonstrated significant antitumor activity in rhabdoid tumor models, but showed no consistent activity against any other histology. Tazemetostat reduced H3K27me3 levels irrespective of tumor response. Further preclinical testing to evaluate tazemetostat in combination with other anticancer agents is warranted.