The authors tested the hypothesis that members of stigmatized groups would be unwilling to report that negative events that occur to them are the result of discrimination when they are in the presence of members of a nonstigmatized group. Supporting this hypothesis, women and African Americans were more likely to report that a failing grade assigned by a man or a European American was caused by discrimination, rather than by their own lack of ability, when they made the judgment privately and in the presence of a fellow stigmatized group member. However, they were more likely to indicate that the cause of the failure was lack of ability, rather than discrimination, when they expected to make these judgments aloud in the presence of a nonstigmatized group member.

No abstract

To our knowledge, no published research has developed an individual difference measure of health-related stereotype threat (HRST). We adapted existing measures of academic stereotype threat to the health domain on a sample of black college students (N = 280). The resulting health-related stereotype threat scale-24 (HRST-24) was assessed for internal consistency, construct and incremental validity, and whether it explains variance in self-reported delays among four preventive health behaviors—blood pressure and cholesterol assays, physical exams, and routine checkups. After adjusting for several control variables, the HRST-24’s (full scale α = 0.96) perceived black health inferiority (18 items; α = 0.96) and perceived physician racial bias (6 items; α = 0.85) sub-scales explained unique variance in delays among two of the four behaviors including a blood cholesterol check (p < .01) and routine checkup—albeit at marginal levels (p = .063) in the case of the latter. Overall, these data provide preliminary evidence of construct and incremental validity for the HRST-24 among blacks. Recommendations for administering the scale are provided and future directions for HRST research are discussed.

Research suggests that communications about racial health disparities may adversely affect Blacks. In this study, we varied the message content (Black-White cardiovascular-related disparities + neutral health topics vs. neutral health topics only) embedded in public service announcements given to Black and White participants (N = 86) and had them complete a purported health self-assessment. We used the number of items completed as a measure of task persistence. Our results showed that participants in the disparities condition completed fewer items on average than participants in the neutral condition (p < .01). Planned contrasts revealed that this effect was driven by the responses of Blacks who completed fewer items in the disparities condition (p < .01), though Whites evinced a comparable condition-based trend (p = .12). We found no Black-White differences in the number of items completed in either of our experimental conditions (ps ≥ .53). Although preliminary, our findings suggest that Blacks and Whites exposed to comparative racial disparities messaging about cardiovascular diseases could experience reduced task persistence. Research implications and study limitations are also discussed.

A growing interest in higher education is measuring subject-specific critical thinking (CT), both for its relevance to course and program objectives as well as for examining the effectiveness of targeted instructional interventions. We report psychometric properties of the revised Psychological Critical Thinking Exam (PCTE), a subject-specific CT test recommended in the American Psychological Association's (2013) Guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major. Among 71 psychology students at a small, private university, PCTE items demonstrated moderate to high difficulty and mostly acceptable discrimination. We also found the PCTE to have excellent interrater reliability and good internal consistency and construct validity. This study adds to emerging evidence suggesting the revised PCTE is one useful measure of domain-specific CT skills.