Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most important microvascular complications of diabetes and remains the leading cause of blindness in the working-age individuals. The exact aetiopathogenesis of DR remains elusive despite major advances in basic science and clinical research. Oxidative damage as one of the underlying causes for DR is increasingly being recognised. In humans, three hydroxycarotenoids, lutein (L), zeaxanthin (Z) and -zeaxanthin (MZ), accumulate at the central retina (to the exclusion of all other dietary carotenoids), where they are collectively known as macular pigment. These hydroxycarotenoids by nature of their biochemical structure and function help neutralise reactive oxygen species, and thereby, prevent oxidative damage to the retina (biological antioxidants). Apart from their key antioxidant function, evidence is emerging that these carotenoids may also exhibit neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory function in the retina. Since the preliminary identification of hydroxycarotenoid in the human macula by Wald in the 1940s, there has been astounding progress in our knowledge of the role of these carotenoids in promoting ocular health. While the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 has established a clinical benefit for L and Z supplements in patients with age-related macular degeneration, the role of these carotenoids in other retinal diseases potentially linked to oxidative damage remains unclear. In this article, we comprehensively review the literature germane to the putative protective role of two hydroxycarotenoids, L and Z, in the pathogenesis of DR.
We report the results of the first survey on the management of Graves' orbitopathy amongst oculofacial surgeons in Asia-Pacific. Our respondents practice preferences reflected the Graves' orbitopathy management consensus statement by the European group on Graves' orbitopathy in 2008.
IMPORTANCEA glaucoma-specific instrument for estimating utilities across the spectrum of glaucoma severity is currently lacking, hindering the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of glaucoma treatments.OBJECTIVE To develop and validate the preference-based Glaucoma Utility Instrument (Glau-U) and to ascertain the association between Glau-U utilities and severity of glaucoma and vision impairment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 stages at the Singapore National Eye Centre glaucoma clinics. Stage 1 focused on the identification and pretesting of the Glau-U attributes and was carried out between June 2009 and May 2016. Stage 2 involved the development and administration of the discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey and tasks and was conducted between May 7, 2018, and December 11, 2019. Stage 2 participants were English-or Mandarin-speaking Singaporean citizens or permanent residents of Chinese, Malay, or Indian ethnicity who were 40 years or older and had a clinical diagnosis of glaucoma in at least 1 eye.EXPOSURES Glau-U comprised 6 quality-of-life attributes: activities of daily living, lighting and glare, movement, eye discomfort, other effects of glaucoma, and social and emotional effects. The descriptions or response options for these attributes were no difficulty or never, some difficulty or sometimes, or severe difficulty or often. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESUtility weights for Glau-U were developed using a DCE questionnaire, which was interviewer administered to participants. Mixed logit regression determined utility weights for each health state. Glau-U utility weights across better-or worse-eye glaucoma and vision impairment severity were calculated using 1-way analysis of variance. Correlations between Glau-U utilities and better-or worse-eye visual fields and EuroQol 5-Dimension utilities were ascertained to assess convergent and divergent validity. RESULTSOf the 304 participants (mean [SD] age, 68.3 [8.7] years; 182 men [59.9%]), 281 (92.4%) had no vision impairment in the better eye, 13 (4.3%) had mild impairment, and 10 (3.3%) had moderate to severe vision impairment. Mean (SD) Glau-U utilities decreased as better-eye glaucoma severity increased (none
Precis: Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MPTCP) is only moderately effective in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) and is useful as an adjunct procedure to other glaucoma surgeries. There was a small risk of loss of vision, prolonged hypotony, and phthisis bulbi. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of a single MPTCP treatment for an Asian population with advanced glaucoma. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center study of 207 eyes (207 patients) with advanced glaucoma which underwent first-time MPTCP between January 1, 2008, and March 31, 2018. Success was defined as IOP of 6 to 21 mm Hg or ≥20% reduction in IOP without an increase in glaucoma medication from baseline, and without glaucoma reoperation. The IOP, best-corrected visual acuity, and number of glaucoma medications were also analyzed. Results: The mean (SD) age was 64.9±16.9 years. The mean follow-up duration was 18.7±16.2 months. The rate of success at postoperative years 1 and 2 follow-up was 44.1% and 32.6%, respectively. The median survival time of MPTCP was 9.0 months and 85 (40.9%) eyes received reoperation. The mean IOP decreased from 31.5±12.0 mm Hg preoperatively to 22.1±10.3 and 23.8±11.8 mm Hg at postoperative years 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.0001). The mean number of glaucoma medications was reduced from 3.3±1.0 preoperatively to 2.6±1.1 and 2.4±1.1 at postoperative years 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.0001). Significant complications included prolonged hypotony [1 eye (0.5%)], phthisis bulbi [7 eyes (3.4%)], and best-corrected visual acuity reduction [29 eyes (13.9%)]. Conclusion: Single first-time MPTCP for advanced glaucoma eyes was moderately effective in lowering IOP but >50% failed by 1 year.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.