BackgroundOutdoor air pollution, given its demonstrated negative effects on the respiratory system, is a growing public health concern worldwide, particularly in urban cities. Human exposure to pollutants such as ozone, nitrogen oxides, combustion-related particulate matter and oxides of sulfur is responsible for significant cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality in both adults and children. Several antioxidants have shown an ability to partially attenuate the negative physiological and functional impacts of air pollutants. This study systematically presents current data on the potential benefits of antioxidant supplementation on lung function outcomes associated with air pollutant exposures in intact humans.MethodsElectronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, Web of Sciences, Environmental Sciences & Pollution Management and TOXNET) were systematically searched for all studies published up to April 2009. Search terms relating to the concepts of respiratory tract diseases, respiratory function tests, air pollution, and antioxidants were used. Data was systematically abstracted from original articles that satisfied selection criteria for inclusion. For inclusion, the studies needed to have evaluated human subjects, given supplemental antioxidants, under conditions of known levels of air pollutants with measured lung function before and after antioxidant administration and/or air pollution exposure. Selected studies were summarized and conclusions presented.ResultsEight studies investigated the role of antioxidant supplementation on measured lung function outcomes after subject exposure to air pollutants under controlled conditions; 5 of these studies concluded that pollutant-induced airway hyper-responsiveness and diminution in lung function measurements were attenuated by antioxidant supplementation. The remaining five studies took place under ambient (uncontrolled) exposures and unanimously concluded that antioxidant supplementations attenuate the negative effects of urban air pollution on lung function.ConclusionsThe data evaluating modification of changes in lung function associated with air pollutant exposure by antioxidant supplementation, in intact humans, is limited. Of 13 studies dedicated to this concern, ten demonstrated an attenuation of pollution-associated decrements. There is growing evidence for the benefit of anti-oxidant supplementation in moderating the effects of air pollution on lung function, but more research on human participants is needed to inform this topic.
Objective. To document options metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients chose for third-line chemo-therapy within the Alberta Cancer Board (ACB) between December 1995 to April 2000. To record the early market experience with capecitabine use in MBC. Methods. Treatment of MBC with a marketed taxane between December 1995 and April 2000 was reviewed. Patients were included if they were within treatment guidelines of the Alberta Cancer Board Outpatient Cancer Drug Benefit Program, and excluded if they were currently on a taxane, treated outside guidelines, or died before receiving a third-line agent. Pre- and postcapecitabine availability cohorts were used to compare prescribing patterns. Results. Before the availability of capecitabine, vinorelbine was the most prescribed third-line chemotherapy (18.8%). After its availability, cape-citabine was the most prescribed third-line chemo-therapy (44.9%). Patients experienced, in order of decreasing frequency, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and nausea as side effects of capecitabine. The majority of dose changes to capecitabine were side effect-related. The first dose was decreased on average by 24.2%, and the sum of the first and second dose adjustments averaged 44.2%. For patients who have discontinued capecitabine, 66.7% were due to disease-related reasons. Conclusion. At the ACB, capecitabine is the current primary choice of third-line chemotherapy. During early experience with its usage, capecitabine was well tolerated and toxicity was adequately managed by dose adjustments. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2001) 6, 138-145.
Background: Cardiac dysfunction is a major concern for patients with breast cancer (BC) receiving adjuvant therapy. Retrospective, cross-sectional echocardiographic data suggests that patients with cancer have reduced myocardial strain prior to cancer therapy exposure. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard imaging modality for cardiac structure and function and can also evaluate myocardial micro-architecture with T1 mapping. We hypothesized that treatment naïve patients with early-stage BC (ESBC) have abnormal myocardial tissue characteristics on CMR. Methods: Women with newly diagnosed ESBC were prospectively recruited for CMR prior to cancer drug treatment. Those with hypertension, diabetes mellitus or prior cancer treatments were excluded. Age and sex matched healthy controls were identified from a prior prospective study. All participants underwent a non-contrast CMR scan on a 1.5T magnet. Image acquisition included cines for cardiac structure and function as well as T1 mapping using saturation recovery single-shot acquisitions. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was derived from cine images. Demographics and imaging metrics for healthy controls and patients were compared using two-sample t-test. Results: 106 patients with ESBC, mean age 51±9, were included along with 55 matched healthy controls. Body mass index and systolic blood pressure were similar between groups, however resting heart rate was elevated in patients compared to controls, 77±11 vs 67±11 /min respectively, p<0.001 (Table 1). On CMR there was no difference in left ventricular volume or ejection fraction however global longitudinal strain was higher in patients compared to controls, -20.9±2.3 vs -19.9±3.7%, p=0.04 (Table 2). Left ventricular mass was higher compared to controls, 52±6 and 47±6 g/m2 respectively, p<0.001. However myocardial T1 was similar between groups, T1=1198±27ms for controls vs 1206±46ms for patients, p=0.42. Conclusions: The cardiac phenotype of patients with ESBC is characterized by relative left ventricular hypertrophy with normal myocardial tissue. Further understanding of the mechanisms involved may provide insight into the cardiovascular risk associated with BC diagnosis. Table 1.Demographics Healthy Controls (n=55)Breast Cancer (n=106)P valueAge, years (SD)52(14)51(9)0.49Body mass index, kg/m2 (SD)26(5)27(6)0.38Hypertension, number00NADiabetes Mellitus, number00NAReceptor status, number (%) NAER/PRNA92(87%) HER2NA74(70%) Triple negativeNA2(2%) Stage, number (%) NA1NA43(42%) 2NA41(38%) 3NA23(20%) Systolic blood pressure, mmHg (SD)127(15)124(13)0.19Heart rate, /min (SD)67(11)77(11)<0.001SD=standard deviation, NA=not applicable Table 2.Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Healthy Controls (n=55)Breast Cancer (n=106)P valueLVEF, % (SD)62(4)62(5)0.91Indexed LVEDV, ml/m2 (SD)69(9)72(14)0.18Indexed LV mass, g/m2 (SD)47(6)52(6)<0.001LV mass/LVEDV (SD)0.69(0.08)0.74(0.13)0.002Indexed left atrial volume, ml/m2 (SD)40(9)37(10)0.21Global longitudinal strain, % (SD)-19.9(3.7)-20.9(2.3)0.04Myocardial T1, ms (SD)1198(27)1206(46)0.42SD=standard deviation, LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDV=left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LV=left ventricular Citation Format: Kirkham A, Xu L, Wang H, Chow K, Pagano JJ, White J, Haykowsky MJ, Dyck JR, Ezekowitz JA, Oudit GY, Mackey JR, Thompson RB, Pituskin E, Paterson I. Breast cancer diagnosis is associated with relative left ventricular hypertrophy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-03-07.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.