This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Background Correction of hammertoe deformities at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint results in an inherent loss of motion that can be a concern for active patients who want to maintain toe function and grip strength. Diaphyseal proximal phalangeal shortening osteotomy (DPPSO) is a joint-sparing procedure resecting a cylindrical portion of the proximal phalanx on the middiaphysis. Patients/Methods This was a retrospective review including patients treated using DPPSO with at least a 1-year follow-up. Demographic, comorbidity, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and complication data were obtained. Radiological assessment included union status and alignment. Medial frontal anatomical (mFAA), frontal proximal interphalangeal (mFIA), plantar lateral anatomical (pLAA), and medial and plantar lateral interphalangeal angles (pLIA) were measured. Results A total of 31 patients (45 toes) were included, with a mean age of 59 years (range: 24-72) and follow-up of 35 months (range: 12-60; mean preoperative VAS score was 4.9 ± 1.72 improving to 1.62 ± 2.28; P < .01). Union occurred in all patients at an average of 11.2 weeks. Complications were present on 4 toes (8.8%), with no recurrences. The pLIA significantly changed from 44.9° to 17.9°. There were no significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative values of the mFAA, pLAA, and mFIA. Conclusions DPPSO provides adequate pain relief and corrects the PIP joint in the lateral plane without significantly affecting the coronal plane or the anatomical axis of the phalanx in the frontal and lateral views, nor producing secondary deformities. DPPSO is a safe, effective, and reproducible technique with a low complication rate. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series
Category:
Ankle, Hindfoot, Trauma
Introduction/Purpose:
Open Achilles tendon repair is typically performed in the prone position for easy visibility of the tendon, but serious complications may be associated with general anesthesia in this position. Open Achilles tendon repair with supine position has been described and potentially avoids these issues, but it is not known whether this position is safe. We reviewed the complication rate of supine open Achilles tendon repair in a retrospective series of patients, looking specifically at wound healing, infection, re-rupture, and sural nerve injury.
Methods:
CPT codes for Achilles tendon rupture were used to search the records of one surgeon for the years 2010-2014. The charts were then reviewed. Patients were included if they had an Achilles tendon rupture that was surgically treated with primary repair in the supine position within 15 days of injury. Patients were excluded if further reconstruction or tendon transfer was performed. A paramedian incision was utilized 1 cm medial to the Achilles sheath.
Results:
A total of 37 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these 37 patients, 31 were men and 6 were women. The average age was 40.0 years (range, 20 to 66 years). Average length of follow-up was 159 days (range 25 to 1589 days). The average BMI was 28 (range 24-36). There were no major complications, including no infections or wound complications. No reruptures and no sural nerve injuries were observed.
Conclusion:
In 37 patients with early follow-up, supine open Achilles tendon repair had a complication rate equivalent to reported historical data for the prone procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.