The novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, can present with a wide range of neurological manifestations, in both adult and pediatric populations. We describe here the case of a previously healthy 8-year-old girl who presented with seizures, encephalopathy, and rapidly progressive, diffuse, and ultimately fatal cerebral edema in the setting of acute COVID-19 infection. CSF analysis, microbiological testing, and neuropathology yielded no evidence of infection or acute inflammation within the central nervous system. Acute fulminant cerebral edema (AFCE) is an often fatal pediatric clinical entity consisting of fever, encephalopathy, and new-onset seizures followed by rapid, diffuse, and medically-refractory cerebral edema. AFCE occurs as a rare complication of a variety of common pediatric infections and a CNS pathogen is identified in only a minority of cases, suggesting a para-infectious mechanism of edema. This report suggests that COVID-19 infection can precipitate AFCE, and highlights the need for high suspicion and early recognition thereof.

Primary intracranial collision tumors are rare in patients without predisposing factors. We report such a case in a 42-year-old female who presented with headaches and altered mental status. Imaging revealed a single heterogeneous, rim-enhancing lesion in the left parieto-occipital periventricular region, involving the corpus callosum. Stereotactic biopsy demonstrated glioblastoma. Subsequent tumor resection showed histologic evidence of glioblastoma and meningioma. Next-generation sequencing was performed on both tumor components. The glioblastoma exhibited a CDKN2A homozygous deletion and novel missense mutations in TAF1L and CSMD3, while no definitive genetic alterations were identified in the meningioma. Next-generation sequencing may yield insight into molecular drivers of intracranial collision tumors and aid in identifying future therapeutic targets.

No abstract

Objectives Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) confers a survival advantage for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and is now recommended for chemotherapy-eligible patients. NAC may result in absent gross tumor, and current cystectomy gross examination protocols do not specify approach for these cases. Methods We included cystectomies performed from 2010 to 2018, capturing a period pre- and post-NAC recommendations. Gross descriptions were reviewed and slides of patients who received NAC were evaluated for microscopic tumor, number of blocks with tumor, and location of those blocks. Results We identified 239 radical cystectomies for bladder cancer (147 NAC, 92 non-NAC). Gross lesions were not identified for 91 cases. NAC cases had more total blocks submitted (mean, 17.5) compared with non-NAC cases (mean, 16.6). More NAC cases had additional blocks submitted (20 cases) compared with non-NAC cases (2), which were more frequently additional random sections. Of 108 NAC cases with residual carcinoma, only 2 (1.9%) were upstaged on additional random sections. Conclusions At our institution, NAC and non-NAC cases are grossed with similar numbers of initial blocks; however, NAC cases are more likely to submit additional sections of gross lesions and random bladder without significant changes in stage. Our data suggest current gross examination protocols are sufficient for NAC cystectomies.

No abstract