Black girls in the U.S. experience high levels of discrimination and adversity. Resilience is a term used within social work, psychology, and health professions to indicate positive adaptation to adversity, trauma, or stress. This article examines traditional and alternative models of resilience through analyses of quantitative and qualitative data from an evaluation of a year-long empowerment program for 33 Black girls (mean age ¼ 14.97 years). Based on critical consciousness theory and Black feminism, this program was designed to empower participants through critical reflection and development of positive gendered racial identity. Quantitative analyses found no change over time in traditional measures of individual resilience. However, alternative measures of collective resilience show positive change. Specifically, quantitative analyses reveal that participants developed increased awareness of structural inequalities faced by Black girls/women and decreased adherence to neoliberal ideologies of personal responsibility and individual striving. Additionally, qualitative analyses show that participants critically reflected on their experiences of oppression, developed mutual support and positive gendered racial identity, and engaged in collective action. These findings demonstrate positive effects of empowerment-based programing, challenge the utility of traditional, individually-focused models of resilience, and reframe Black girls' resistance to injustice as an alternative, collective form of resilience.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.