The population pharmacokinetics of infliximab were characterized in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (n = 274). Serum infliximab concentration data, from a 2-year period, were analyzed using NONMEM. A 2-compartment linear pharmacokinetic model was chosen to describe the pharmacokinetic characteristics of infliximab in serum. Population estimates (typical value +/- standard error) were obtained from the final covariate model: clearance (CL: 0.273 +/- 0.007 L/day), volume of distribution in the central compartment (V(1): 3.06 +/- 0.057 L), intercompartment clearance (Q: 1.72 +/- 0.48 L/day), and volume of distribution in the peripheral compartment (V(2): 2.94 +/- 0.17 L). Interindividual variability for CL and V(1) was 34.1% and 17.5%, respectively. White blood cell count at baseline and the antibody-to-infliximab status were significant covariates to CL; body surface area and sex were significant covariates to V(1). The CL for patients with a positive antibody-to-infliximab status was estimated to be 41.9% to 76.7% higher than for the remaining patients. Other covariates (baseline disease activity and the concomitant medication use of prednisolone, omeprazole, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or analgesics) did not affect infliximab pharmacokinetics. The development of antibodies to infliximab was associated with accelerated infliximab clearance and may represent a potential underlying mechanism for an inadequate response, or loss of response, to infliximab treatment.

A formal assessment of the drug-drug interaction potential of any investigational drug product often requires multiple metabolic and pharmacokinetic evaluations. In contrast to a small-molecule drug, investigating the drug-drug interaction potential of a monoclonal antibody is inherently complicated. High molecular weight monoclonal antibodies are often genetically engineered to demonstrate strong specificity for a particular human antigen target. Consequently, monoclonal antibodies usually have few clinically relevant animal models--other than nonhuman primates--in which to conduct appropriate nonclinical studies. Likewise, clinical drug-drug interaction studies of monoclonal antibodies with long elimination half-lives pose definite operational challenges as conventional crossover studies with adequate washout periods are difficult to conduct. Furthermore, the current regulatory guidance on the design and conduct of in vitro and in vivo drug-drug interaction studies applies more readily to small-molecule drugs than protein-based biologics. Nevertheless, a certain amount of clinically useful information has begun to emerge from the published literature on drug-drug interaction potentials of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. This article provides a systematic review of the current literature and offers some practical considerations for the design and conduct of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction assessments involving novel monoclonal antibodies. Ideally, these evaluations should be performed throughout all stages of drug development. In particular, pharmacokinetic interaction studies with any marketed drugs that are likely to be coadministered with the monoclonal antibody will yield the most clinically useful information for practitioners and patients alike.

No abstract

Staff on 94 wards in 78 Veterans Administration Medical Centers caring for Huntington's disease patients were interviewed by telephone to determine their policy, practice, and attitude regarding counseling HD families. Considerable variability among wards within a given hospital and among different hospital was reported. Presentation of genetic information was found to be significantly associated by statistical tests with existence of some kind of ward counseling policy, treatment on a neurology ward, active seeking-out of relatives, construction of pedigree charts, and specific staff designated to provide such counseling. Genetic discussions with families of HD patients and at-risk kindreds raise some sensitive ethical questions, notably the vigorous denial of disease in these families, the high suicide rate of those at-risk, and consideration of patients' rights regarding privacy of medical data. A consistent genetic information-giving policy, at least among wards of each hospital and possibly among all hospitals within a large hospital system, is recommended as a logical and desirable goal.

No abstract